ArticleBlood advances2023
Brentuximab vedotin plus AVD for Hodgkin lymphoma: incidence and management of peripheral neuropathy in a multisite cohort.
Article in Blood advances, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nivolumab+AVD in Advanced-Stage Classic Hodgkin's Lymphoma.The New England journal of medicine · 2024Trial
- Outcomes of Brentuximab Vedotin Monotherapy in Refractory/Relapsed Classical Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study on Survival and Safety.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2026Article
- Adriamycin, Vinblastine and Dacarbazine With Immunotherapy Achieves Complete Metabolic Response in a Patient With Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma and Dyskeratosis Congenita.Journal of hematology · 2026Article
- Peripheral Neuropathy Incidence in Children, and Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer and Medicaid Insurance in California.JCO oncology practice · 2026Article
- Brentuximab Vedotin With Adriamycin, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine for Patients Aged 18-59 Years With Untreated Advanced Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: The Largest Real-Life Series From Southern Italy Cancer Centers.European journal of haematology · 2026Observational
- Nivolumab-AVD versus Brentuximab Vedotin-AVD as First-Line Treatment for Advanced-Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2026Article
- Metabolic Interactions in the Tumor Microenvironment of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: Implications for Targeted Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Impact of Comorbidities on Prognosis and Treatment Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma.Clinics and practice · 2025Article
- Frontline brentuximab vedotin-based therapy for newly diagnosed classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Longitudinal study of cognitive and mental functions among adult Hodgkin-lymphoma survivors, based on data from a primary treatment center in Hungary.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Understanding the chemistry & pharmacology of antibody-drug conjugates in triple-negative breast cancer with special reference to exatecan derivatives.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Brentuximab vedotin (BV) in combination with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD) is increasingly used for frontline treatment of stage III/IV classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Peripheral neuropathy (PN) was the most common and treatment-limiting side effect seen in clinical trials but has not been studied in a nontrial setting, in which clinicians may have different strategies for managing it. We conducted a multisite retrospective study to characterize PN in patients who received BV + AVD for newly diagnosed cHL. One hundred fifty-three patients from 10 US institutions were eligible. Thirty-four patients (22%) had at least 1 ineligibility criteria for ECHELON-1, including stage, performance status, and comorbidities. PN was reported by 80% of patients during treatment; 39% experienced grade (G) 1, 31% G2, and 10% G3. In total, BV was modified in 44% of patients because of PN leading to BV discontinuation in 23%, dose reduction in 17%, and temporary hold in 4%. With a median follow-up of 24 months, PN resolution was documented in 36% and improvement in 33% at the last follow-up. Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) for the advanced-stage patients was 82.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.90) and overall survival was 97.4% (95% CI, 0.94-1.00). Patients who discontinued BV because of PN did not have inferior PFS. In the nontrial setting, BV + AVD was associated with a high incidence of PN. In our cohort, which includes patients who would not have been eligible for the pivotal ECHELON-1 trial, BV discontinuation rates were higher than previously reported, but 2-year outcomes remain comparable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.