ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2023
Delineating Structural Propensities of the 4E-BP2 Protein via Integrative Modeling and Clustering.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The 4E-BPs as Translational Regulators in Neurological Disorders: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Biological insights from integrative modeling of intrinsically disordered protein systems.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025Review
- Local Disordered Region Sampling (LDRS) for ensemble modeling of proteins with experimentally undetermined or low confidence prediction segments.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Local Disordered Region Sampling (LDRS) for Ensemble Modeling of Proteins with Experimentally Undetermined or Low Confidence Prediction Segments.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The intrinsically disordered 4E-BP2 protein regulates mRNA cap-dependent translation through interaction with the predominantly folded eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E). Phosphorylation of 4E-BP2 dramatically reduces the level of eIF4E binding, in part by stabilizing a binding-incompatible folded domain. Here, we used a Rosetta-based sampling algorithm optimized for IDRs to generate initial ensembles for two phospho forms of 4E-BP2, non- and 5-fold phosphorylated (NP and 5P, respectively), with the 5P folded domain flanked by N- and C-terminal IDRs (N-IDR and C-IDR, respectively). We then applied an integrative Bayesian approach to obtain NP and 5P conformational ensembles that agree with experimental data from nuclear magnetic resonance, small-angle X-ray scattering, and single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET). For the NP state, inter-residue distance scaling and 2D maps revealed the role of charge segregation and pi interactions in driving contacts between distal regions of the chain (∼70 residues apart). The 5P ensemble shows prominent contacts of the N-IDR region with the two phosphosites in the folded domain, pT37 and pT46, and, to a lesser extent, delocalized interactions with the C-IDR region. Agglomerative hierarchical clustering led to partitioning of each of the two ensembles into four clusters with different global dimensions and contact maps. This helped delineate an NP cluster that, based on our smFRET data, is compatible with the eIF4E-bound state. 5P clusters were differentiated by interactions of C-IDR with the folded domain and of the N-IDR with the two phosphosites in the folded domain. Our study provides both a better visualization of fundamental structural poses of 4E-BP2 and a set of falsifiable insights on intrachain interactions that bias folding and binding of this protein.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.