Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37594780›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

Clinical Integration of Digital Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Primary Health Care for Chronic Disease Management: Protocol for a Systematic Review.

Maxime Sasseville, Wilfried Supper, Jean-Baptiste Gartner, Géraldine Layani, Samira Amil, Peter Sheffield, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Catherine Hudon, Sylvie Lambert, Eugène Attisso and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Maxime SassevilleUniversité Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1694-1414
Wilfried SupperUniversité Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6642-5768
Jean-Baptiste GartnerUniversité Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5907-6112
Géraldine LayaniUniversité de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1764-6433
Samira AmilVITAM Research Center, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4024-9762
Peter SheffieldUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1869-5035
Marie-Pierre GagnonUniversité Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0782-5457
Catherine HudonUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6140-9916
Sylvie LambertUniversité McGill, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9202-9251
Eugène AttissoUniversité Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0820-0993
Victoria Bureau LagardeUniversité Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9654-576X
Mylaine BretonUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5713-9618
Marie-Eve PoitrasUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3315-0190
Pierre PluyeUniversité McGill, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4517-3653
Pierre-Henri Roux-LevyUniversité de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7716-9931
James PlaisimondUniversité Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4986-7712
Frédéric BergeronUniversité Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0978-7420
Rachelle AshcroftUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5666-1946
Sabrina WongDivision of Intramural Research, National Institute of Nursing Research, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9619-9012
Antoine GroulxUniversité Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0995-093X
Nicolas BeaudetOmnimed, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2349-2362
Jean-Sébastien PaquetteUniversité Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9524-6761
Natasha D'AnjouUniversité Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7168-6639
Sylviane LangloisUniversité Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Annie LeBlancUniversité Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5377-8102

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth measurement guides policies and health care decisions are necessary to describe and attain the quintuple aim of improving patient experience, population health, care team well-being, health care costs, and equity. In the primary care setting, patient-reported outcome measurement allows outcome comparisons within and across settings and helps improve the clinical management of patients. However, these digital patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are still not adapted to the clinical context of primary health care, which is an indication of the complexity of integrating these tools in this context. We must then gather evidence of their impact on chronic disease management in primary health care and understand the characteristics of effective implementation.

objectiveWe will conduct a systematic review to identify and assess the impact of electronic PROMs (ePROMs) implementation in primary health care for chronic disease management. Our specific objectives are to (1) determine the impact of ePROMs in primary health care for chronic disease management and (2) compare and contrast characteristics of effective ePROMs' implementation strategies.

methodsWe will conduct a systematic review of the literature in accordance with the guidelines of the Cochrane Methods Group and in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for its reporting. A specific search strategy was developed for relevant databases to identify studies. Two reviewers will independently apply the inclusion criteria using full texts and will extract the data. We will use a 2-phase sequential mixed methods synthesis design by conducting a qualitative synthesis first, and use its results to perform a quantitative synthesis.

resultsThis study was initiated in June 2022 by assembling the research team and the knowledge transfer committee. The preliminary search strategy will be developed and completed in September 2022. The main search strategy, data collection, study selection, and application of inclusion criteria were completed between October and December 2022.

conclusionsResults from this review will help support implementation efforts to accelerate innovations and digital adoption for primary health care and will be relevant for improving clinical management of chronic diseases and health care services and policies.

trial registrationPROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42022333513; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=333513. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48155.

Indexed as

health careimplementation sciencepatient-reported outcome measureprimary healthcaresystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37594780
PMCPMC10474503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.