Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37594600›Full record

ArticleOecologia2023

Using eDNA to understand predator-prey interactions influenced by invasive species.

Maria Riaz, Dan Warren, Claudia Wittwer, Berardino Cocchiararo, Inga Hundertmark, Tobias Erik Reiners, Sven Klimpel, Markus Pfenninger, Imran Khaliq, Carsten Nowak

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Maria RiazConservation Genetics Section, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, 63571, Frankfurt, Gelnhausen, Germany. hmmmariariaz@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0146-3846
Dan WarrenBiodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan.
Claudia WittwerConservation Genetics Section, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, 63571, Frankfurt, Gelnhausen, Germany.
Berardino CocchiararoConservation Genetics Section, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, 63571, Frankfurt, Gelnhausen, Germany.
Inga HundertmarkHessische Gesellschaft Für Ornithologie Und Naturschutz (HGON E. V.), Lindenstrasse 5, 61209, Echzell, Germany.
Tobias Erik ReinersConservation Genetics Section, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, 63571, Frankfurt, Gelnhausen, Germany.
Sven KlimpelLOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Markus PfenningerLOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics (LOEWE-TBG), Senckenberganlage 25, 60325, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Imran KhaliqDepartment of Education, Punjab, Pakistan.
Carsten NowakConservation Genetics Section, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, 63571, Frankfurt, Gelnhausen, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DESenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt/M · DEHessian Agency for Nature Conservation, Environment and Geology · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University · JPSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive predatory species may alter population dynamic processes of their prey and impact biological communities and ecosystem processes. Revealing biotic interactions, however, including the relationship between predator and prey, is a difficult task, in particular for species that are hard to monitor. Here, we present a case study that documents the utility of environmental DNA analysis (eDNA) to assess predator-prey interactions between two invasive fishes (Lepomis gibbosus, Pseudorasbora parva) and two potential amphibian prey species, (Triturus cristatus, Pelobates fuscus). We used species-specific TaqMan assays for quantitative assessment of eDNA concentrations from water samples collected from 89 sites across 31 ponds during three consecutive months from a local amphibian hotspot in Germany. We found a negative relationship between eDNA concentrations of the predators (fishes) and prey (amphibians) using Monte-Carlo tests. Our study highlights the potential of eDNA application to reveal predator-prey interactions and confirms the hypothesis that the observed local declines of amphibian species may be at least partly caused by recently introduced invasive fishes. Our findings have important consequences for local conservation management and highlight the usefulness of eDNA approaches to assess ecological interactions and guide targeted conservation action.

Indexed as

DNA, EnvironmentalAnimalsAnuraEcosystemGermanyIntroduced SpeciesDNA, EnvironmentalAmphibian declineBiotic interactionsEnvironmental DNAInvasive speciesPredator–prey interactions

Identifiers

PMID37594600
PMCPMC10474997
OpenAlexW4385969346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.