Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37594598›Full record

ReviewGeroScience2024

A revisiting of "the hallmarks of aging" in domestic dogs: current status of the literature.

Ana Gabriela Jiménez

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in GeroScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. How can we achieve more accurate reporting of average dog lifespan?Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana Gabriela JiménezDepartment of Biology, Colgate University, 13 Oak Dr, Hamilton, NY, 133546, USA. ajimenez@colgate.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9586-2866
Colgate University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A progressive decline in biological function and fitness is, generally, how aging is defined. However, in 2013, a description on the "hallmarks of aging" in mammals was published, and within it, it described biological processes that are known to alter the aging phenotype. These include genomic instability, telomere attrition, epigenetic alterations, loss of proteostasis, deregulated nutrient sensing, mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular senescence, stem cell exhaustion, altered intercellular communication (inflammation), and changes within the microbiome. This mini-review provides a detailed account of the progress on each of these hallmarks of aging in the domestic dog within the last 5 years. Additionally, when there are gaps in the literature between other mammalian species and dogs, I highlight the aging biomarkers that may be missing for dogs as aging models. I also argue for the importance of dog aging studies to include several breeds of dogs at differing ages and for age corrections for breeds with differing mean lifespans throughout.

Indexed as

AgingEpigenesis, GeneticAnimalsCellular SenescenceDogsMammalsPhenotypeStem CellsAltered intercellular communicationCellular senescenceDeregulated nutrient sensingDog agingEpigenetic alterationsGenomic instabilityInflammagingLoss of proteostasisMicrobiomeMitochondrial dysfunctionStem cell exhaustionTelomere attrition

Identifiers

PMID37594598
PMCPMC10828135
OpenAlexW4385969042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.