Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37594569›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2024

Similarities of SNARC, cognitive Simon, and visuomotor Simon effects in terms of response time distributions, hand-stimulus proximity, and temporal dynamics.

Lizhu Yan, Yilin Ma, Weibin Yang, Xinrui Xiang, Weizhi Nan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lizhu Yan *Department of Psychology and Center for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, School of Education, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou University, 230 Wai Huan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Yilin Ma *Department of Psychology and Center for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, School of Education, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou University, 230 Wai Huan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Weibin Yang *Department of Psychology and Center for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, School of Education, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou University, 230 Wai Huan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Xinrui XiangDepartment of Psychology and Center for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, School of Education, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou University, 230 Wai Huan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510006, China.
Weizhi NanDepartment of Psychology and Center for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, School of Education, Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangzhou University, 230 Wai Huan Xi Road, Guangzhou, 510006, China. nanwz@gzhu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8022-8093

Funding

the Philosophy and Social Sciences Co-construction Project in Guangdong Province of China GD17XXL03the Youth Project of Basic and Applied Basic Research Fund of Guangdong Province - Regional Joint Fund 2021A1515110452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) and Simon effects are attributed to the same type of conflict according to dimensional overlap (DO) theory: the congruency of task-irrelevant spatial information and the selected response (e.g., left or right). However, previous studies have yielded inconsistent results regarding the relationship between the two effects, with some studies reporting an interaction while others did not. This discrepancy may be attributed to the use of different types of Simon effects (visuomotor and cognitive Simon effects) in these studies, as the spatial codes associated with these two types of Simon effects are distinct (exogenous and endogenous, respectively). The aim of this study was to address these inconsistencies and gain a better understanding of the similarities and differences in spatial representations generated by spatial location, semantic information, and numerical information. We attempted to classify the relationships among the SNARC and Simon effects. Specifically, the visuomotor Simon, cognitive Simon, and SNARC effects were compared from three perspectives: the response time (RT) distribution, hand-stimulus proximity, and temporal dynamics (with the drift diffusion model; DDM). Regarding RTs, the results showed that the visuomotor Simon effect decreased with increased values of RT bins, while the cognitive Simon and SNARC effects increased. Additionally, the visuomotor Simon effect was the only effect influenced by hand-stimulus proximity, with a stronger effect observed in the hand-proximal condition than in the hand-distal condition. Regarding the DDM results, only the visuomotor Simon effect exhibited a higher drift rate and longer non-decision time in the incompatible condition than in the compatible condition. Conversely, both the SNARC and cognitive Simon effects exhibited an inverse pattern regarding the drift rate and no significant difference in non-decision time between the two conditions. These findings suggest that the SNARC effect is more similar to the cognitive Simon effect than the visuomotor Simon effect, indicating that the endogenous spatial-numerical representation of the SNARC effect might share an underlying processing mechanism with the endogenous spatial-semantic representation of the cognitive Simon effect but not with the exogenous location representation of the visuomotor Simon effect. Our results further demonstrate that the origin of spatial information could impact the classification of conflicts and supplement DO theory.

Indexed as

CognitionSemanticsHumansReaction TimeSpace Perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.