Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37594552›Full record

SynthesisLangenbeck's archives of surgery2023

Accuracy of deep neural learning models in the imaging prediction of pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review.

Sowmya Prabhakaran, Keith Wai Keong Choong, Swetha Prabhakaran, Kay Tai Choy, Joseph Ch Kong

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sowmya PrabhakaranDepartment of General Surgical Specialties, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. sowmyaprabhakaran@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2977-2226
Keith Wai Keong ChoongDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7743-2261
Swetha PrabhakaranDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3010-5247
Kay Tai ChoyDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5763-5742
Joseph Ch KongDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1392-2480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUp to 15-27% of patients achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Deep neural learning (DL) algorithms have been suggested to be a useful adjunct to allow accurate prediction of pCR and to identify patients who could potentially avoid surgery. This systematic review aims to interrogate the accuracy of DL algorithms at predicting pCR.

methodsEmbase (PubMed, MEDLINE) databases and Google Scholar were searched to identify eligible English-language studies, with the search concluding in July 2022. Studies reporting on the accuracy of DL models in predicting pCR were selected for review and information pertaining to study characteristics and diagnostic measures was extracted from relevant studies. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS).

resultsOur search yielded 85 potential publications. Nineteen full texts were reviewed, and a total of 12 articles were included in this systematic review. There were six retrospective and six prospective cohort studies. The most common DL algorithm used was the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Performance comparison was carried out via single modality comparison. The median performance for each best-performing algorithm was an AUC of 0.845 (range 0.71-0.99) and Accuracy of 0.85 (0.83-0.98).

conclusionsThere is a promising role for DL models in the prediction of pCR following neoadjuvant-CRT for LARC. Further studies are needed to provide a standardised comparison in order to allow for large-scale clinical application. PROPERO REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021269904 Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021269904 .

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Second PrimaryRectal NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceDeep neural learningLong course neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyMagnetic resonance imagingRectal cancerTherapeutic response

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.