Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37594525›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2024

The utility of standing knee radiographs for detection of lipohemarthrosis: comparison with supine horizontal beam radiographs.

Ozgur Tosun, Kazim Ayberk Sinci, Tayfun Bacaksiz, Mustafa Cagatay Buyukuysal, Cemal Kazimoglu, Atilla Hikmet Cilengir

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ozgur TosunDepartment of Radiology, Near East University Medical Faculty, Lefkosa, North Cyprus, Turkey. drozgurtosun@gmail.com.
Kazim Ayberk SinciDepartment of Radiology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Tayfun BacaksizDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Mustafa Cagatay BuyukuysalDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Cemal KazimogluDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Izmir Katip Celebi University Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Atilla Hikmet CilengirDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Democracy University, Izmir, Turkey.
Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University · TRBülent Ecevit University · TRIzmir University · TRNear East University · CY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesLipohemarthrosis is a key finding in acute trauma patients and indicates an intra-articular fracture. The horizontal beam lateral radiography with supine position is known to be the best technique to demonstrate knee lipohemarthrosis. Our main purpose was to compare the sensitivity of supine and standing lateral knee radiographs to detect lipohemarthrosis.

methodsIn our retrospective study, consecutive patients with lipohemarthrosis on computed tomography of the knee between October 2019 and September 2021 were included. Fractured bone, the presence of lipohemarthrosis, and image quality in both standing and supine anteroposterior and lateral knee radiographs were evaluated. Interobserver reliability of the three observers was calculated. Fisher exact chi-square and z-proportion tests were used to compare lateral and anteroposterior knee radiographs. Krippendorff's Alpha and Kappa coefficients were used for inter-observer agreement.

resultsA total of 61 patients (38 men [62.3%], 23 women [37.7%]; mean age, 43 years ± 17 [standard deviation]) were included. The most common type of fracture was isolated tibial fractures (n = 32; 52.5%). The sensitivity of showing lipohemarthrosis of standing lateral knee radiographs (95.5%) was higher than supine lateral radiographs (38.5%) (p < 0.001). While non-optimal image quality did not affect lipohemarthrosis detection on lateral radiographs (p > 0.99), it caused a significant decrease in the diagnosis of lipohemarthrosis on anteroposterior radiographs (p = 0.036). We found a good-excellent interobserver agreement in lipohemarthrosis detection.

conclusionsStanding lateral radiographs have higher sensitivity than supine lateral radiographs in detecting lipohemarthrosis and are beneficial for detecting lipohemarthrosis which indicates the presence of occult-evident intraarticular fracture in patients with knee trauma. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Standing lateral knee radiographs offer a useful method for reducing the misdiagnosis of the occult intra-articular fractures by showing the fat-fluid leveling more clearly. Its advantages may be more prominent when the advanced imaging modalities are limited. KEY POINTS: • Fat-fluid level (lipohemarthrosis) is an important radiographic sign to assess patients with acute trauma. It almost always indicates an intra-articular fracture. • Our retrospective study results support that lipohemarthrosis sign could be observed more frequently in standing lateral knee radiographs than in supine lateral radiographs. • Knee trauma patients, when available, should be evaluated with standing lateral radiographs for the diagnosis of lipohemarthrosis.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneFractures, ClosedIntra-Articular FracturesAdultFemaleHemarthrosisHumansMaleRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedIntra-articular fracturesKneeRadiographyTrauma

Identifiers

PMID37594525
OpenAlexW4385968678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.