Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37594502›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Types and doses of anti-adhesive agents injected into subacromial space do not have an effect on the clinical and anatomical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.

Jongwon Lee, Jong Pil Yoon, Youngje Woo, Kyung-Soo Oh, Seok Won Chung

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jongwon LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-Ro (Hwayang-Dong), Gwangjin-Gu, Seoul, 143-729, Korea.
Jong Pil YoonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University, School of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Youngje WooDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-Ro (Hwayang-Dong), Gwangjin-Gu, Seoul, 143-729, Korea.
Kyung-Soo OhDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-Ro (Hwayang-Dong), Gwangjin-Gu, Seoul, 143-729, Korea.
Seok Won ChungDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine, 120-1 Neungdong-Ro (Hwayang-Dong), Gwangjin-Gu, Seoul, 143-729, Korea. smilecsw@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8221-9289
Konkuk University · KRKyungpook National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeJoint stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a major concern for orthopaedic surgeons. Various antiadhesive agents are commonly administered after rotator cuff repair for its prevention. This study aimed to compare the outcomes among patients injected with different types and amounts of anti-adhesive agents after rotator cuff repair. It was hypothesized that the outcomes might differ depending on the use of the anti-adhesive agent and its type and dose.

methodsA total of 267 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with or without subacromial injection of anti-adhesive agents were enrolled. The first group (group A; 51 patients) were injected with 3 mL of poloxamer/sodium alginate-based anti-adhesive agent. The second group (group B; 93 patients) were injected with 3 mL of sodium hyaluronate-based anti-adhesive agent. The third group (group C; 82 patients) were injected with 1.5 mL of sodium hyaluronate-based anti-adhesive agent. Finally, the last group (group D; 41 patients) who did not use anti-adhesive agents served as the control. The range of motion (ROM) and pain VAS scores were measured preoperatively and at 5 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Functional outcomes were evaluated using American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant scores, whereas cuff integrity was assessed via MRI or ultrasonography at least 6 months postoperatively.

resultsAll ROM measurements, pain VAS scores, and functional scores were significantly improved regardless of the use, type, and dose of the anti-adhesive agents. In addition shoulder ROM and rotator cuff healing did not significantly differ among the groups (all n.s.).

conclusionsNo significant differences were found in the clinical and anatomical outcomes according to the type and dose of the anti-adhesive agents subacromially injected after rotator cuff repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyHyaluronic AcidRotator Cuff InjuriesAgedAlginatesFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRange of Motion, ArticularRotator CuffTissue AdhesionsTreatment OutcomeAlginatesHyaluronic AcidAnti-adhesive agentPoloxamer/sodium alginateRotator cuff repairSodium hyaluronate

Identifiers

PMID37594502
OpenAlexW4385969459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.