Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37594245›Full record

ArticleJournal of feline medicine and surgery2023

Effect of gabapentin on ambulatory, direct, systemic arterial blood pressure in apparently healthy cats in the at-home and in-clinic environments.

Mélissa Cm De Lombaert, Bianca N Lourenço, Amanda E Coleman, Allison M Arne, Roy D Berghaus, Chad W Schmiedt

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mélissa Cm De LombaertDepartment of Small Animal Medicine & Surgery, University of Georgia, College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3312-0098
Bianca N LourençoDepartment of Small Animal Medicine & Surgery, University of Georgia, College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5249-4645
Amanda E ColemanDepartment of Small Animal Medicine & Surgery, University of Georgia, College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, GA, USA.
Allison M ArneDepartment of Small Animal Medicine & Surgery, University of Georgia, College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, GA, USA.
Roy D BerghausDepartment of Population Health, University of Georgia, College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, GA, USA.
Chad W SchmiedtDepartment of Small Animal Medicine & Surgery, University of Georgia, College of Veterinary Medicine, Athens, GA, USA.
University of Georgia · USGeorgia College & State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSituational increases in blood pressure (BP) frequently confound the accurate diagnosis of pathological systemic hypertension in cats. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of gabapentin on direct, ambulatory systolic arterial BP (SBP) in cats in at-home and in-clinic environments.

methodsSix adult purpose-bred cats with surgically implanted femoral artery telemetric BP-sensing catheters were administered 100 mg of gabapentin or a placebo orally in two randomized, masked, crossover study phases. In the first, direct BP was measured continuously in undisturbed cats for 24 h before (at-home baseline) and 4 h after administration of study drug. The mean SBP after administration of the drug was compared between treatments. In the second study period, cats were administered gabapentin or placebo 90 mins before transport to a clinic, where direct BP was measured continuously during a simulated veterinary visit that included an indirect BP measurement session. Changes in mean direct SBP relative to the 24-h at-home pre-treatment period were calculated for each of one waiting room and two examination-room periods, and compared between treatments. Concurrent in-clinic direct and indirect SBP measurements were compared within-cat. Data were compared using linear mixed models.

resultsDirect SBP data from one cat were excluded due to implant failure. There were no differences in at-home or in-clinic SBP between treatment groups, with large inter-individual variability. Cats in both treatment groups experienced in-clinic increases in direct SBP relative to at-home baseline (range 11-50 and 10-52 mmHg in placebo- and gabapentin-treated cats, respectively). Across all visits, direct SBP was 15.6 mmHg higher than indirect SBP ( CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Significant effects of gabapentin on direct SBP were not identified, though a type II error is possible. Situational increases cannot be excluded in gabapentin-treated cats with high SBP.

Indexed as

Arterial PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationAnimalsBlood PressureCatsCross-Over StudiesGabapentinGabapentinBlood pressureDoppler sphygmomanometryradiotelemetric cathetersimulated veterinary visit

Identifiers

PMID37594245
PMCPMC10811997
OpenAlexW4385969708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.