Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37594162›Full record

ArticleSuicide & life-threatening behavior2023

Brief relationship support as a selective suicide prevention intervention: Piloting the Relationship Checkup in veteran couples with relationship and mental health concerns.

Dev Crasta, Jennifer S Funderburk, Tatiana D Gray, James V Cordova, Peter C Britton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Associations among psychological health problems, intimate-relationship problems, and suicidal ideation among United States Air Force active-duty personnel.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dev CrastaCenter of Excellence for Suicide Prevention, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Canandaigua, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6304-8544
Jennifer S FunderburkDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.
Tatiana D GrayDepartment of Psychology, Springfield College, Springfield, Massachusetts, United States.
James V CordovaDepartment of Psychology, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Peter C BrittonCenter of Excellence for Suicide Prevention, US Department of Veterans Affairs, Canandaigua, New York, USA.
United States Department of Veterans Affairs · USClark University · USSpringfield College · USSUNY Upstate Medical University · US

Funding

Supporting Relationships to Reduce Suicide Risk: A Randomized Control Trial of the Brief Relationship CheckupIK2RX003823 · VA · VETERANS AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF · PI CRASTA, DEV J · 2023 to 2025
–
RRD VA IK2 RX003823
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClose relationship problems play a key role in many contemporary theories of suicide. However, the potential of relationship support in suicide prevention is understudied. This study explores the feasibility, safety, acceptability, and promise of utilizing the 3-session Relationship Checkup (RC) in veterans with mental health and romantic relationship concerns.

methodsWe conducted a single-arm pilot of telehealth RC in veterans with a positive mental health screen and their romantic partners. Couples completed baseline and post-treatment assessments of study outcomes.

resultsFeasibility analyses showed we were able to recruit an elevated-risk sample (30% history of attempts or interrupted attempts), take them through the service (90% treatment completion), and had minimal harm events (no suicidal behavior, no physical harm in arguments). Multimethod acceptability analyses suggested high satisfaction with the program, though some desired more intensive services. Couples reported improvements in relationship functioning, emotional intimacy, thwarted belongingness, depression, and posttraumatic stress. Perceived burdensomeness only improved for identified patients and drinking did not change for either partner.

conclusionThe RC is a feasible, safe, and acceptable strategy for providing relationship support to couples at elevated risk. Although further randomized trials are needed, RC shows promise to reduce relationship-level and individual-level suicide risk factors.

Indexed as

SuicideVeteransHumansInterpersonal RelationsMental HealthRisk FactorsSuicidal IdeationSuicide Preventioncouplessuicideveteran

Identifiers

PMID37594162
PMCPMC10591926
OpenAlexW4385969510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.