Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37594016›Full record

RevieweLife2023

A review of HPV and HBV vaccine hesitancy, intention, and uptake in the era of social media and COVID-19.

Emily K Vraga, Sonya S Brady, Chloe Gansen, Euna Mehnaz Khan, Sarah L Bennis, Madalyn Nones, Rongwei Tang, Jaideep Srivastava, Shalini Kulasingam

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Emily K VragaHubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3016-3869
Sonya S BradyDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, United States.
Chloe GansenHubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.
Euna Mehnaz KhanDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0030-7841
Sarah L BennisDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, United States.
Madalyn NonesDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, United States.
Rongwei TangHubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3441-276X
Jaideep SrivastavaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Science and Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United States.
Shalini KulasingamDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, United States.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization named vaccine hesitancy as one of the top 10 threats to global health. The impact of hesitancy on the uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines was of particular concern, given the markedly lower uptake compared to other adolescent vaccines in some countries, notably the United States. With the recent approval of COVID-19 vaccines, coupled with the widespread use of social media, concerns regarding vaccine hesitancy have grown. However, the association between COVID-related vaccine hesitancy and cancer vaccines such as HPV is unclear. To examine the potential association, we performed two reviews using Ovid Medline and APA PsychInfo. Our aim was to answer two questions: (1) Is COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, intention, or uptake associated with HPV or hepatitis B (HBV) vaccine hesitancy, intention, or uptake? and (2) Is exposure to COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on social media associated with HPV or HBV vaccine hesitancy, intention, or uptake? Our review identified few published empirical studies that addressed these questions. Our results highlight the urgent need for studies that can shift through the vast quantities of social media data to better understand the link between COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and disinformation and its impact on uptake of cancer vaccines.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesCOVID-19Papillomavirus InfectionsSocial MediaAdolescentCOVID-19 VaccinesHepatitis B virusHumansIntentionPandemicsVaccination HesitancyCancer VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinescoronavirusCOVID vaccineepidemiologyglobal healthHPV vaccinemisinformationsocial mediaviruses

Identifiers

PMID37594016
PMCPMC10438906
OpenAlexW4385969264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.