Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37593701›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2023

Game Changers: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Innovations of the Last 100 Years.

Arya Asghari, Madeline J O'Connor, Philopatir Attalla, Emily Ewing, Clara J Lee, Arin Greene, Clara N Lee, Scott Lifchez, Justin M Sacks, Amanda Gosman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Venture Capital's Role in Advancing Plastic Surgery.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Arya AsghariFrom California Northstate University College of Medicine, Elk Grove, Calif.
Madeline J O'ConnorCreighton University School of Medicine, Phoenix, Ariz.
Philopatir AttallaGeorgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, D.C.
Emily EwingDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Ala.
Clara J LeeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.
Arin GreeneDepartment of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Clara N LeeOhio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Scott LifchezDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, Baltimore, Md.
Justin M SacksDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Mo.
Amanda GosmanDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Innovation is an essential aspect of plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS), whether it involves improving current processes or implementing radical change that disrupts the status quo. Collaborating and sharing innovations help advance the field of PRS as a whole. Methods: An anonymous survey was administered to members of the American Association of Plastic Surgeons on their opinions of the top five innovations in PRS of the last 100 years. Results: A list of 69 unique innovations were compiled; the top five innovations overall were microsurgery, myocutaneous flaps, craniofacial surgery, negative pressure wound therapy, and organ transplantation. This list was reviewed by the American Association of Plastic Surgeons Technology Committee, and expanded to 100 unique innovations. Conclusions: We discuss why the above innovations were essential to the development of PRS, as well as the unique factors that can make a new product or procedure into something that remodels the field of PRS.

Identifiers

PMID37593701
PMCPMC10431564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.