ReviewHeliyon2023
Oral proprietary Chinese medicine for lupus nephritis: A bayesian network meta-analysis.
Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Jieduquyuziyin prescription for systemic lupus erythematosus: a system-level therapeutic strategy for immunological recalibration.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Mechanistic study of compound Muniziqi granule on lupus nephritis in MRL/lpr mice: insights from transcriptomics and experimental validation.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the efficacy and safety of proprietary Chinese medicines for the treatment of Lupus Nephritis (LN) based on the reticulated meta analysis. The study aim to provide evidence-based evidence for the clinical treatment of LN. Methods: The studies related to the randomized controlled studies (RCTs) on the treatment of LN with oral proprietary Chinese medicines were obtained from China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP), SinoMed, Wanfang, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane Library databases since its inception-August 2022. Cochrane tools were used for risk bias assessment, Stata 13.0 and ADDIS 1.16.5 software were used for net evidence analysis.Results.1) 41 RCTs with 3124 L N patients were included, involving 9 types of proprietary Chinese medicines.2) The meta-analysis showed that in terms of efficacy, the top 3 Chinese patent medicine interventions were Xin Gan Bao Capsule (XGB) +western medicines (WM), Huang Kui Capsule (HK) + WM, Kun Xian Capsule (KX) + WM; in terms of reducing adverse event rate, the top 3 Chinese patent medicine interventions were Yi Shen Hua Shi Granules (YSHS) + WM, Jin Shui Bao Capsule (JSB) + WM, HK + WM; in terms of reducing 24 h urine protein, the top 3 Chinese patent medicine interventions were XGB + WM, YSHS + WM, Bai Ling Capsule (BL) + WM; in terms of reducing blood creatinine (Cr), the top 3 Chinese patent medicine interventions were Yi Shen Granules (YS) + WM, JSB + WM, KX + WM; in terms of reducing urea nitrogen (BUN), the top 3 Chinese patent medicine interventions were Shen Kang Capsule (SK) + WM, HK + WM, JSB + WM; in terms of reducing systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI) scores, the top 3 Chinese patent medicine interventions were JSB + WM, BL + WM, YSHS + WM; in terms of improving complement C3, the top 3 Chinese patent medicine interventions were HK + WM, XGB + WM, BL + WM; in terms of improving complement C4, the top 3 Chinese patent medicine interventions were KX + WM, YSHS + WM, BL + WM. Conclusion: Xin Gan Bao Capsule has a good efficacy in improving efficiency and the level of complement C3, lowering 24 h urine protein. Jin Shui Bao Capsule and Huang Kui Capsule have a good efficacy in treating LN. However, more multicentre, large sample and high quality RCTs are needed for validation the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.