Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37593536›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Intensive Care Society2022

Co-enrolment to UK Critical Care Studies - A 2019 update.

Timothy Felton, Natalie Pattison, Simon Fletcher, Simon Finney, Tim Walsh, Paul Dark

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy FeltonAcute Intensive Care Unit, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6868-6633
Natalie PattisonSchool of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
Simon FletcherAnaesthetics and Intensive Care, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK.
Simon FinneyIntensive Care and Anaesthesia, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8219-1952
Tim WalshIntensive Care Unit, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France, Edinburgh, UK.
Paul DarkCritical Care Unit, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Northern Care Alliance NHS Group, Greater Manchester, UK.
Barts Health NHS Trust · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSalford Royal NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Hertfordshire · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2013, a group of clinicians on behalf of the National Institute for Health Research, collaborated with ICU Steps to produce guidance about people being enrolled in more than one critical care trial. This is referred to as "co-enrolment" and can be where a person takes part in one study at the same time as another study (or one after the other in a short time-frame). For instance, being part of a study looking at sepsis drugs and a mechanical ventilation weaning study. The drivers for developing this guidance were a lack of any existing guidance, nationally and internationally, at that time, and a desire to ensure high quality research is conducted. The emphasis was on making trials as safe as possible for patients and ensuring robust trial outcomes. Critical care was seen to lead in this, with our exemplar guidance used across all health research. We wish to revisit this guidance now that there is more experience of coenrolment in critical care trials. There is also more awareness of different consent models, such as deferred consent (taking consent when a person is awake and able to give consent) and consultee consent (asking families or independent professionals to consent). Consenting to coenrolment is an important ethical consideration for the revision of this guidance.

Indexed as

clinical trialsCo-enrolment

Identifiers

PMID37593536
PMCPMC10427850
OpenAlexW3098978883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.