ArticleIranian journal of public health2023
Comparing the Effectiveness of Two New CPR Training Methods in Korea: Medical Virtual Reality Simulation and Flipped Learning.
Article in Iranian journal of public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness of virtual and augmented reality for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC medical education · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of a scenario-based gamified virtual reality training on nurses' basic life support knowledge: a randomized controlled trial.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Extended reality technologies in adult basic life support education: A scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2025Review
- Technological innovations in layperson CPR education - A scoping review.Resuscitation plus · 2025Review
- Organizational health culture in the Korean firefighter intervention studies: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The effect of spaced E-Learning on knowledge of basic life support and satisfaction of nursing students: a quasi-experimental study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Implementation of a Smart Teaching and Assessment System for High-Quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A comparison between the effects of simulation of basic CPR training and workshops on firefighters' knowledge and skills: experimental study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Enhancing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training Through Virtual Reality Technology: Assessing Efficiency and Impact.Bulletin of emergency and trauma · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We compared the educational effects of two training methods that have gained momentum: medical virtual reality (medi-VR) simulation and flipped learning. Methods: Firefighters (n=128; 116 men and 12 women; mean age=28 years) in training from the Emergency Educational Simulation Center of Korea National Fire Service Academy, Gongju-si, Korea, were randomly assigned to two groups: medi-VR simulation and flipped learning in 2022. The participants were trained to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) using medi-VR simulation and the flipped learning methods. CPR self-efficacy, knowledge, performance, class immersion, and class satisfaction were compared between the groups. To analyze educational effects, paired and independent Results: The post-education scores for CPR performance knowledge and CPR performance were significantly higher in the medi-VR simulation group compared to the flipped learning counterparts ( Conclusion: Medi-VR simulation can be utilized as effective educational intervention, while providing a new direction for teaching methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.