Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37593505›Full record

ReviewIranian journal of public health2023

Application and Use of Andersen's Behavioral Model as Theoretical Framework: A Systematic Literature Review from 2012-2021.

Abdullah Alkhawaldeh, Mohammed ALBashtawy, Ahmad Rayan, Asem Abdalrahim, Ahmad Musa, Nidal Eshah, Abdallah Abu Khait, Jamal Qaddumi, Omar Khraisat, Sa'd ALBashtawy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Iranian journal of public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Clinical and Epidemiological Profile of Dolutegravir Use and Antiretroviral Resistance in Honduras.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdullah AlkhawaldehDepartment of Community and Mental Health, Princess Salma Faculty of Nursing, Al al-Bayt University, Al-Mafraq, Jordan.
Mohammed ALBashtawyDepartment of Community and Mental Health, Princess Salma Faculty of Nursing, Al al-Bayt University, Al-Mafraq, Jordan.
Ahmad RayanFaculty of Nursing, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Asem AbdalrahimDepartment of Community and Mental Health, Princess Salma Faculty of Nursing, Al al-Bayt University, Al-Mafraq, Jordan.
Ahmad MusaDepartment of Community and Mental Health, Princess Salma Faculty of Nursing, Al al-Bayt University, Al-Mafraq, Jordan.
Nidal EshahFaculty of Nursing, Zarqa University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Abdallah Abu KhaitDepartment of Community and Mental Health, Faculty of Nursing, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Jamal QaddumiFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Omar KhraisatFaculty of Nursing, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Sa'd ALBashtawyMinistry of Health, Irbid, Jordan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anderson's model provides a theoretical structure to understand use of health service. This scoping review aimed to examine the application of Andersen's behavioral model in different studies. Methods: Related studies that were published between 2012 and 2021 were retrieved by searching PubMed, Science Direct, and CINAHL databases. Fourteen studies satisfied the criteria for inclusion. Results: The reviewed studies specified that the Andersen's Model has been used in numerous parts of the health system and concerning different illnesses. The reviewed studies revealed differences in the factors examined. Most of the studies examined age, education, gender, marital status, and employment status as predisposing factors, and income, medical insurance, and living location as enabling factors. While, the chronic illnesses and perceived general health status were examined as need factors, in addition to an extensive diversity of health conditions and illnesses. Though the associations were established among the key factors tested in the reviewed studies and health care service use, the findings were inconsistent. In the reviewed studies, the setting and the study population characteristics looked to have a strong influence on the direction and strength of these associations. Conclusion: Merely a slight number of common factors were examined and there were enormous differences in the methods by which these factors were classified. Future and primary studies are necessary to deepen our understanding of the use of health care services and the complexity of the Andersen's behavioral model.

Indexed as

Andersen’s behavioral modelHealth services utilization

Identifiers

PMID37593505
PMCPMC10430393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.