Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37593355›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2023

Vaccine decision making among people who inject drugs: Improving on the WHO's 3C model of vaccine hesitancy.

Blake Hardin, Melissa Graboyes, Derek Kosty, Camille Cioffi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Blake HardinDepartment of Global Studies, University of Oregon, United States.
Melissa GraboyesDepartment of History, University of Oregon, United States.
Derek KostyPrevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, United States.
Camille CioffiPrevention Science Institute, University of Oregon, United States.

Funding

Prevention of Substance Use in At-risk Students: A Family-centered Web ProgramR01DA037628 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI SEELEY, JOHN R, STORMSHAK, ELIZABETH A · 2015 to 2022
$5.2M
Motivational enhancement to augment contingency management for SARS-CoV-2 testing and vaccination utilization among syringe exchange clientsU01DA055982 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI CIOFFI, CAMILLE C, MAURICIO, ANNE MARIE · 2022 to 2023
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA037628NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA055982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to 1) identify vaccination rates among PWID in Oregon at a time when vaccines were easily accessible, 2) quantitatively identify convergence with demographic correlates of vaccination willingness and uptake to promote generalizability, and 3) explore the factors PWID were considering when deciding whether or not to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. We conducted a mixed-methods study design including 260 quantitative surveys and 41 in-depth qualitative interviews with PWID, conducted July - September 2021 at syringe services programs in Lane County, Oregon. Among the 260 survey respondents, 37.3% indicated that they had received a COVID-19 vaccine by October 1, 2021. In the same period, an estimated 70.1% of the total Lane County population had completed their COVID-19 vaccinations (not including booster rounds). We explored alignment with the WHO's 3C model of vaccine hesitancy and identified, instead, five common factors as key motivators for vaccine decisions: confidence, convenience, concern, communication, and community implications among PWID. Interviews with PWID describe systemic barriers which prevented them from accessing healthcare resources. We highlight that our proposed 5C model may more accurately depict how PWID navigate vaccine decisions by incorporating the ways that social inequities, infrastructural barriers, and community values influence an individual's vaccine deliberation.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health behaviorsMixed-methodsPeople Who Inject DrugsSubstance useVaccinationVaccine deliberation

Identifiers

PMID37593355
PMCPMC10428103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.