Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37593218›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2023

Benefits of topical indigo naturalis nanofibrous patch on psoriatic skin: A transdermal strategy for botanicals.

Pengyu Wang, Junwei Gao, Shijie Guo, Hongmei Liu, Can Cao, Shihao Hong, Yu Sun, Chen Wang, Wei Xiao, Ping Song and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pengyu WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Institute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Junwei GaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Institute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Shijie GuoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Institute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Hongmei LiuKey Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Diagnosis of the Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Hebei University, Baoding, 071002, China.
Can CaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Institute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Shihao HongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Institute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Yu SunDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Institute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Chen WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Institute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Wei XiaoNational Key Laboratory on Technologies for Chinese Medicine Pharmaceutical Process Control and Intelligent Manufacture, Nanjing, 211100, China.
Ping SongGuang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100053, China.
Ning LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Institute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Ruodan XuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Institute of Basic Theory for Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100700, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNChina Pharmaceutical University · CNHebei University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indigo naturalis (IN) has been extensively used as a topical treatment for psoriasis. However, clinical applications of IN in ointment were hampered by its limited transdermal efficiency and dark stains. To address the aforementioned issues, nanopatches carrying IN were fabricated using poly(ε-caprolactone, PCL)/poly(ethylene oxide, PEO) and topically applied to psoriasiform skin. The ideal ratio of 5% PCL/PEO was established to be 80:20 (w/w), and 15% IN as payload was confirmed. Investigations on the three principal active components of IN release indicated that indirubin and tryptanthrin were released in bursts, while indigo was released in a limited and controlled manner. Further biological analyses confirmed a favorable biocompatibility of amphiphilic IN-PCL/PEO, which coincided with the intended therapeutic outcomes as measured by severity index scoring and pathological evaluations

Indexed as

ElectrospinningIndigo naturalisNanopatchPsoriasisTopical drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID37593218
PMCPMC10430593
OpenAlexW4385490642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.