Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37593208›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2023

Digital Therapeutics in Urology: An Innovative Approach to Patient Care and Management.

Severin Rodler, Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski, Henriette Scheibert, Moritz Bensel, Leo Federico Stadelmeier, Amelie Styn, Ines Rivero Belenchon, Mark Taratkin, Stefano Puliatti, Juan Gomez Rivas and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Adoption of Digital Therapeutics in Europe.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Severin RodlerDepatment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Karl-Friedrich KowalewskiDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Henriette ScheibertDepatment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Moritz BenselDepatment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Leo Federico StadelmeierDepatment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Amelie StynDepatment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Ines Rivero BelenchonUrology and Nephrology Department, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Mark TaratkinInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Stefano PuliattiDepartment of Urology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.
Juan Gomez RivasDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Alessandro VecciaUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy.
Pietro PiazzaDivision of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Enrico CheccucciDepartment of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy.
Maurice S MichelDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Christian G StiefDepatment of Urology, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany.
Giovanni CacciamaniUSC Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Young Academic Urologists Urotechnology Group of the European Association of Urology
LMU Klinikum · DEHeidelberg University · DEAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITCandiolo Cancer Institute · ITHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESSechenov University · RUUniversity of Modena and Reggio Emilia · ITUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital therapeutics (DTx) are a new class of intervention involving evidence-based software applications and have been used in neurology and psychiatry. To assess the potential of DTx in urology, we conducted a survey to assess the current prevalence of the digital infrastructure required for DTx, areas of support expected by patients, and requirements for uptake. Between November 2022 and January 2023, we conducted an anonymized survey at two German academic centers among patients with urologic conditions. We found that among patients aged <65 yr versus ≥65 yr, digital devices including smartphones (93.6% vs 77.3%; Patient summary: Patients can use digital therapeutics (DTx), which are mainly smartphone apps, to improve their health status or treat medical conditions. We assessed the current and future use of DTx in urology. Patients are already widely using smartphones and frequently use uncertified health apps, but do not use DTx. Patients would like to use DTx to optimize therapy that provides a significant health improvement.

Indexed as

AppDigital therapeuticsPatient perspectiveUrology

Identifiers

PMID37593208
PMCPMC10432164
OpenAlexW4385566665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.