ReviewEndoscopy international open2023
Advances in artificial intelligence and computer science for computer-aided diagnosis of colorectal polyps: current status.
Review in Endoscopy international open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polyp size measurement during colonoscopy using a virtual scale: variability and systematic differences.Endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Artificial intelligence and digital transformation of gastroenterology and hepatology: A critical review of clinical applications and future challenges.World journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- Structured Integration of an Artificial Intelligence-Based System for the Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps.Gut and liver · 2026Article
- Development of an artificial intelligence model to identify duodenal polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2025Article
- Limited validity of Mayo endoscopic subscore in ulcerative colitis with concomitant primary sclerosing cholangitis.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.