ReviewEndoscopy international open2023
Safety and efficacy of underwater versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.
Review in Endoscopy international open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Innovations in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Techniques and Technologies.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2026Article
- Feasibility Study of Modified Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colorectal Polyps.DEN open · 2026Article
- Safety Profile of Low-Power Pure-Cut Hot Snare Polypectomy for 10-14 mm Nonpedunculated Colorectal Neoplasms.DEN open · 2026Article
- Optimizing detection and resection of colorectal polyps.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Outcomes of Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Giant Colorectal Polyps: A Multicenter Study.Endoscopy international open · 2026Article
- Scarred and complex colorectal polyps: Traditional techniques and emerging alternatives.World journal of methodology · 2025Review
- Of Endpoints and Equipoise: Reforming Clinical Trials in Colorectal Polyp Resection.Current gastroenterology reports · 2025Review
- Current Trends in the Management of a Complex Polyp: Endoscopy versus Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2025Review
- Endoscopic approach to large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of water pressure method for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Propensity-score matching analysis.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
- Endoscopic resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps: current standards of treatment.eGastroenterology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.