Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37593143›Full record

ArticleInternet interventions2023

A self-management psychoeducational eHealth program to support and empower people with advanced cancer and their family caregivers: Development using the scrum methodology.

Vincent Van Goethem, Sigrid Dierickx, Orphé Matthys, Laurel Northouse, Line Lund, Catherine Jordan, Elena Turola, Maaike van der Wel, David Scott, Richard Harding and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internet interventions, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Technology-based applications for relatives and caregivers of people with advanced breast cancer-a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Vincent Van GoethemVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Sigrid DierickxVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Orphé MatthysVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Laurel NorthouseUniversity of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Line LundDepartment of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Catherine JordanUniversity College Dublin, National University of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Elena TurolaScientific Directorate, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Maaike van der WelErasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
David ScottThe School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Richard HardingCicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Luc DeliensVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Lore LapeireVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
DIAdIC team
Peter HudsonVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Aline De VleminckVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.
Joachim CohenVrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, End-of-life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: eHealth programs could be a flexible and scalable resource to support and empower people with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. A face-to-face intervention that has demonstrated effectiveness is the "FOCUS" program, developed and tested in the USA. Recently the FOCUS program was translated and adapted to the European context as part of an international study in six European countries, resulting in the "FOCUS+" program. FOCUS+ served as the basis for development of the web-based iFOCUS program. Objective: We aim to (1) describe the development process of the iFOCUS program, (2) outline the challenges we encountered and how they were overcome, and (3) present findings regarding the acceptability and usability of iFOCUS. Methods: We used the four phased agile Scrum methodology to develop iFOCUS and applied set timeframes of rapid program development and evaluation (sprints). Five teams were involved in the development i.e. a core development group, a web development team, an international consortium, audio-visual experts, and potential end-users. Results: Development followed seven steps, integrated across the four phases of Scrum: (1) concept design, (2) development of mock-ups, (3) Feedback from the international consortium, (4) technical development of iFOCUS, (5) creating versions for the six participating countries, (6) preliminary testing of iFOCUS and (7) implementing the final version in a randomized controlled trial. User testing included 42 participants (twenty patient-family caregiver dyads and two bereaved family caregivers) who reviewed the iFOCUS program. Users found the iFOCUS program to be acceptable and usable. Feedback mainly focused on text size and fonts. Minor changes to the content, tailoring, and program flow were required. During development we encountered program specific and general challenges. Using the Scrum methodology facilitated iterative development to address these issues. For some challenges, such as tailoring, we had to make pragmatic choices due to time and resource limitations. Conclusions/discussion: The development of a tailored, self-managed psychoeducational eHealth program for people with advanced cancer and their family caregivers is an intense process and requires pragmatic choices. By keeping the emphasis on the target population during development, no specific remarks pertaining to advanced cancer were identified. Some challenges we encountered are common to eHealth development, others were related to program specific requirements. Using the Scrum methodology allows teams to efficiently collaborate during program development and increases the flexibility of the development process. Interpersonal contact between research staff and potential end-users is recommended during and after the development of eHealth programs.

Indexed as

Advanced cancerDyadiceHealthFamily caregiverIntervention developmentPsychoeducational intervention

Identifiers

PMID37593143
PMCPMC10428037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.