Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37593120›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes research2023

The Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 Questionnaire: A Sensitive Test to Detect Risk for Autonomic Neuropathy.

Sondre Meling, Erling Tjora, Heike Eichele, Niels Ejskjaer, Siri Carlsen, Pål Rasmus Njølstad, Christina Brock, Eirik Søfteland

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Primary focal hyperhidrosis and autonomic symptom burden: a case-control study using the COMPASS-31 questionnaire.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Validation of the Arabic version of the composite autonomic symptom score 31 questionnaire in diabetic autonomic neuropathy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sondre MelingDepartment of Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9045-1408
Erling TjoraDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8878-8669
Heike EicheleDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8916-2484
Niels EjskjaerDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3749-3403
Siri CarlsenDepartment of Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7484-6036
Pål Rasmus NjølstadDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0304-6728
Christina BrockDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3381-1884
Eirik SøftelandDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7221-1013
Haukeland University Hospital · NOStavanger University Hospital · NOSteno Diabetes Centers · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Autonomic neuropathy is a common but often neglected complication of diabetes, prediabetes, and even in individuals with an elevated risk of diabetes. The Composite Autonomic Symptom Score (COMPASS) 31 is a validated and easy-to-use questionnaire regarding autonomic symptoms. We aimed to use a digitally, Norwegian version of the COMPASS 31 in people with different durations of diabetes and healthy controls to consider feasibility and to investigate if scores could discriminate between positive and negative outcomes for established tests for diabetic neuropathy, including cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) and a novel method of examining the gastrointestinal visceral sensitivity. Method: We included 21 participants with longstanding type 2 diabetes, 15 with early type 2 diabetes, and 30 matched controls. The mean age for all groups was 69 years. Participants were phenotyped by cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests, electrical skin conductance, sural nerve electrophysiology, and the monofilament test. As a proxy for gastrointestinal visceral and autonomic nerve function, evoked potentials were measured following rapid rectal balloon distention. Results: Participants with longstanding diabetes scored a median (IQR) of 14.9 (10.8-28.7) points, early diabetes of 7.3 (1.6-15.2), and matched controls of 8.6 (4.1-21.6), Conclusion: We successfully used COMPASS 31 in Norwegian. Thus, following the guidelines, we suggest clinical implementation for the assessment of autonomic neuropathy. Participants with longstanding diabetes had an increased likelihood of symptoms and signs of autonomic neuropathy. For screening purposes, the sensitivity was improved by lowering the cut-off to 10 points, with a lower score nearly excluding the diagnosis.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NeuropathiesPrediabetic StateAgedAutonomic Nervous SystemFemaleHumansMaleRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID37593120
PMCPMC10432092
OpenAlexW4385693629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.