Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37592814›Full record

ArticleThe FEBS journal2023

A simple bypass assay for DNA polymerases shows that cancer-associated hypermutating variants exhibit differences in vitro.

Gilles Crevel, Stephen Kearsey, Sue Cotterill

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The FEBS journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gilles CrevelMCS, St George's University London, UK.
Stephen KearseyDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, UK.
Sue CotterillMCS, St George's University London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9913-0259
St George's, University of London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L016591/Medical Research Council MR/L016591/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Errors made by DNA polymerases contribute to both natural variation and, in extreme cases, genome instability and its associated diseases. Recently, the importance of polymerase misincorporation in disease has been highlighted by the identification of cancer-associated polymerase variants with mutations in the exonuclease domain. A subgroup of these variants have a hypermutation phenotype in tumours, and when modelled in yeast, they show mutation rates in excess of that seen with polymerase with simple loss of proofreading activity. We have developed a bypass assay to rapidly determine the tendency of a polymerase to misincorporate in vitro. We have used the assay to compare misincorporation by wild-type, exonuclease-defective and two hypermutating human DNA polymerase ε variants, P286R and V411L. The assay clearly distinguished between the misincorporation rates of wild-type, exonuclease dead and P286R polymerases. However, the V411L polymerase showed misincorporation rate comparable to the exonuclease dead enzyme rather than P286R, suggesting that there may be some differences in the way that these variants cause hypermutation. Using this assay, misincorporation opposite a templated C nucleotide was consistently higher than for other nucleotides, and this caused predominantly C-to-T transitions. This is consistent with the observation that C-to-T transitions are commonly seen in DNA polymerase ε mutant tumours.

Indexed as

DNA Polymerase IINeoplasmsDNA ReplicationExonucleasesHumansMutationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeDNA Polymerase IIExonucleasesDNA polymerase epsilonDNA replication fidelitypolymerase-associated hypermutation

Identifiers

PMID37592814
PMCPMC10953417
OpenAlexW4385969615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.