Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37592251›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2023

Early vascular aging as an index of cardiovascular risk in healthy adults: confirmatory factor analysis from the EVasCu study.

Alicia Saz-Lara, Iván Cavero-Redondo, Carlos Pascual-Morena, Irene Martínez-García, Eva Rodríguez-Gutiérrez, Maribel Lucerón-Lucas-Torres, Bruno Bizzozero-Peroni, Nerea Moreno-Herráiz, Arturo Martínez-Rodrigo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying cardiovascular aging.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alicia Saz-LaraHealth and Social Research Center, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Iván Cavero-RedondoUniversidad Autónoma de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Talca, Chile. Ivan.Cavero@uclm.es.
Carlos Pascual-MorenaHealth and Social Research Center, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Irene Martínez-GarcíaHealth and Social Research Center, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Eva Rodríguez-GutiérrezHealth and Social Research Center, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Maribel Lucerón-Lucas-TorresHealth and Social Research Center, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Bruno Bizzozero-PeroniHealth and Social Research Center, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Nerea Moreno-HerráizHealth and Social Research Center, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Arturo Martínez-RodrigoResearch Group in Electronic, Biomedical, and Telecommunication Engineering, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concept of early vascular aging (EVA) represents a potentially beneficial model for future research into the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the early manifestations of cardiovascular disease. For this reason, the aims of this study were to verify by confirmatory factor analysis the concept of EVA on a single factor based on vascular, clinical and biochemical parameters in a healthy adult population and to develop a statistical model to estimate the EVA index from variables collected in a dataset to classify patients into different cardiovascular risk groups: healthy vascular aging (HVA) and EVA.

methodsThe EVasCu study, a cross-sectional study, was based on data obtained from 390 healthy adults. To examine the construct validity of a single-factor model to measure accelerated vascular aging, different models including vascular, clinical and biochemical parameters were examined. In addition, unsupervised clustering techniques (using both K-means and hierarchical methods) were used to identify groups of patients sharing similar characteristics in terms of the analysed variables to classify patients into different cardiovascular risk groups: HVA and EVA.

resultsOur data show that a single-factor model including pulse pressure, glycated hemoglobin A1c, pulse wave velocity and advanced glycation end products shows the best construct validity for the EVA index. The optimal value of the risk groups to separate patients is K = 2 (HVA and EVA).

conclusionsThe EVA index proved to be an adequate model to classify patients into different cardiovascular risk groups, which could be valuable in guiding future preventive and therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesAdultAgingCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansPulse Wave AnalysisRisk FactorsAdvanced glycation end productsEarly vascular agingGlycated hemoglobinHealthy adultsPulse pressurePulse wave velocity

Identifiers

PMID37592251
PMCPMC10436435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.