ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2024
Radiofrequency energy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction-a novel cohort pilot study on safety, applicability, and short-term efficacy.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short-term safety and preliminary patient-reported outcomes of bipolar radiofrequency therapy for mild-to-moderate erectile dysfunction: a prospective single-arm pilot study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Vibradiofotology Technology using the ERECTOFIX Device in the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Pilot Study.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The erectile mechanism depends, in part on the intactness of the collagen components in the penis. As such, impaired collagen may have a deleterious effect on erectile function. Radiofrequency energy has been shown to renew and restore spatial structural arrangement of collagen fibers; therefore, treatment of erectile dysfunction with radiofrequency could lead to anatomical and physiological changes at the penile tissue level and could lead to improvement in the erectile mechanism. We conducted this study to assess the effect of radiofrequency treatment on erection quality. We evaluated the safety, applicability, and efficacy of a self-applied, handheld, low-intensity radiofrequency device (Vertica®) in men with moderate and mild-to-moderate organic erectile dysfunction. The treatment protocol consisted of 12 treatments (twice a week during the 1st month, and once a week during the 2nd month), and each participant treated himself individually. Treatment outcomes were evaluated using the International Index of Erectile Function, Erection Hardness Scale, Erectile Dysfunction Index of Treatment Satisfaction, Benefit, Satisfaction & Willingness to continue, Quality of Erection Questionnaire, Sexual Quality of Life questionnaires and specific questions addressing side effects and ease of use. Twenty-eight out of 32 men (mean age 59.5 ± 9.8, range: 41-78 years) completed a one-month follow-up after treatment. Mean International Index of Erectile Function (43.7. ± 7.8 vs. 60.9 ± 10.8, p < 0.01), International Index of Erectile Function -Erection Function domain (16.8 ± 3.1 vs. 24.4 ± 4.4, p < 0.001), and Erection Hardness Scores (2.2 ± 0.8 vs. 3.2 ± 0.5, p = 0.01) were all significantly improved. Fifty percent of patients achieved normal erectile function parameters according to the International Index of Erectile Function -Erection Function domain score >25. High mean scores were achieved in the Erectile Dysfunction Index of Treatment Satisfaction (76.8 ± 20.3), Benefit, Satisfaction & Willingness to continue (4.83 ± 1.1), Quality of Erection Questionnaire (73.4 ± 23.8), and Sexual Quality of Life (67 ± 29.4) questionnaires. No side effects were reported and participants rated the device as very comfortable, simple, and easy to operate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.