Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37592089›Full record

ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2023

[Knowledge and misconceptions on advance directives-results of a citizen survey].

Carolin Fleischmann, Tanja Henking, Silke Neuderth

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carolin FleischmannInstitut für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften, Technische Hochschule Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Münzstr. 12, 97070, Würzburg, Deutschland. projekt-auge.fas@fhws.de.
Tanja HenkingInstitut für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften, Technische Hochschule Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Münzstr. 12, 97070, Würzburg, Deutschland.
Silke NeuderthInstitut für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften, Technische Hochschule Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Münzstr. 12, 97070, Würzburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance directives (ADs) such as living wills or healthcare powers of attorney are important tools to anticipate medical treatment decisions when decision-making capacity is lost in the future. Although a rising number of citizens in Germany are creating such documents, little is known about their knowledge of the purpose, types, and use of ADs. After more than 10 years since legislation on ADs came into force, this study intends to measure the objective knowledge of citizens and detect deficits in knowledge.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional quantitative survey of citizens aged 18+ in the city and county of Wuerzburg. The questionnaire included, among other things, possession, experience, and knowledge of ADs. Sampling was conducted via advertising and local networking.

resultsOf the 282 participants who took part in the survey (M DISCUSSION: The relatively high rate of ADs in this sample indicates their rapid dissemination during the past few years in Germany. Overall, the level of knowledge ADs appears to be low, revealing misconceptions about the creator's and involved people's rights and obligations. The measured knowledge level contradicts with the frequently expressed desire of citizens to preserve their autonomy by creating ADs for themselves.

Indexed as

Advance DirectivesDecision MakingCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesAdvance care planningAdvance directivesEnd-of-life decisionsKnowledgeLiving will

Identifiers

PMID37592089
PMCPMC10539417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.