Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37592045›Full record

ReviewSurgical endoscopy2023

Surgical approaches for core abdominal injuries: a review of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database.

Ryan Ellis, Sara Maskal, Ajita Prabhu, Clayton Petro, Lucas Beffa, Michael Rosen, Benjamin Miller, David Krpata

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ryan EllisCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. ellisr2@ccf.org.ORCID 0000-0001-7206-3543
Sara MaskalCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Ajita PrabhuCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Clayton PetroCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Lucas BeffaCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Michael RosenCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Benjamin MillerCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
David KrpataCleveland Clinic Center for Abdominal Core Health, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCore abdominal injury (CAI) is a broad term that describes injuries resulting from repetitive loading of the pubis that leads to inflammation, rupture, or destabilization of the core muscles from the pubic bone. There is no clear recommendation on the surgical approach to CAI. We aimed to describe how hernia surgeons within the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) address this problem surgically and the short-term outcomes.

methodsWe queried the ACHQC registry for patients undergoing surgery for isolated CAI and concomitant inguinal hernias (IH) and CAI. Operative approach and quality of life (using EuraHS survey scores) was abstracted.

resultsA total of 29,451 patients underwent surgery for IHs, CAIs, or both within the registry. Twenty patients underwent surgery for isolated CAI (median age 29, 90% males). Eleven patients (55%) underwent surgery with mesh (four Lichtenstein, three TAPP, and four TEP). Nine patients (45%) underwent tissue-based repairs (four closure of floor, one Bassini, one McVay, one Shouldice, one femoral exploration, and one laparoscopic-to-open conversion). There were no postoperative complications or reoperations within 30 days. EuraHS scores showed improvement at 30 days from baseline (median 29 [6.75-41.75] from 42 [29.42-57.61]). Sixty patients had both IHs and CAIs (median age 31, 97% males). All patients received mesh. Thirty-one patients (52%) underwent open surgery (23 Lichtenstein, 1 plug, 7 TREPP) and 29 underwent minimally invasive repairs (23 TAPP, 6 TEP). There was one seroma at 30 days. EuraHS scores showed improvement at 30 days from baseline (median 16 [5.17-27.33] from 37.5 [26.44-46.58]).

conclusionsDespite technical variability, CAIs with or without concomitant IH generally undergo operations commonly used for IH repairs. Within our series, there was inconsistency with approach and mesh placement. Future work should be focused on standardizing the approach to CAI and capturing long-term data within the ACHQC.

Indexed as

Abdominal InjuriesHernia, InguinalLaparoscopyAdultFemaleHerniorrhaphyHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsQuality of LifeSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeChronic groin painCore abdominal injuryGilmore’s groinInguinal disruptionSports hernia

Identifiers

PMID37592045
OpenAlexW4385948989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.