Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37591983›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2023

Flexible social inference facilitates targeted social learning when rewards are not observable.

Robert D Hawkins, Andrew M Berdahl, Alex 'Sandy' Pentland, Joshua B Tenenbaum, Noah D Goodman, P M Krafft

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Agenda Setting andOpen mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Humans flexibly integrate social information despite interindividual differences in reward.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Group Coordination Catalyzes Individual and Cultural Intelligence.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2024
    Article
  10. Collective cognition and behaviour.Nature human behaviour · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert D HawkinsDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. rdhawkins@wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9089-8544
Andrew M BerdahlSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5057-0103
Alex 'Sandy' PentlandMIT Media Lab, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Joshua B TenenbaumDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Noah D GoodmanDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
P M KrafftDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) 1122374National Science Foundation (NSF) 14747
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Groups coordinate more effectively when individuals are able to learn from others' successes. But acquiring such knowledge is not always easy, especially in real-world environments where success is hidden from public view. We suggest that social inference capacities may help bridge this gap, allowing individuals to update their beliefs about others' underlying knowledge and success from observable trajectories of behaviour. We compared our social inference model against simpler heuristics in three studies of human behaviour in a collective-sensing task. Experiment 1 demonstrated that average performance improved as a function of group size at a rate greater than predicted by heuristic models. Experiment 2 introduced artificial agents to evaluate how individuals selectively rely on social information. Experiment 3 generalized these findings to a more complex reward landscape. Taken together, our findings provide insight into the relationship between individual social cognition and the flexibility of collective behaviour.

Indexed as

RewardSocial CognitionSocial LearningAdultFemaleGroup ProcessesHeuristicsHumansMaleModels, PsychologicalSocial BehaviorSocial PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.