Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37591651›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Population health differences in cross-border regions within the European Union and Schengen area: a protocol for a scoping review.

Sophie Stroisch, Viola Angelini, Sebastian Schnettler, Tobias Vogt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sophie StroischPopulation Research Centre, University of Groningen Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands s.stroisch@rug.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9398-6934
Viola AngeliniFaculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5177-3447
Sebastian SchnettlerInstitute for Social Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Tobias VogtPopulation Research Centre, University of Groningen Faculty of Spatial Sciences, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1962-3473

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlong with European integration and the harmonisation of living conditions, improvements in health have been observed over the past decades. However, sociospatial inequalities within and across member states still exist today. While drivers of these health inequalities have been widely researched on a national and regional scale, cross-border regions remain understudied. The removal of border controls within the European Union (EU) member states has facilitated economic convergence and created new opportunities, including cross-border cooperation in the healthcare systems. However, whether and how these developments have influenced the population health in the respective cross-border regions is unclear. Hence, this scoping review aims to examine the empirical literature on the changes in health outcomes over time at the population level in EU cross-border areas. Additionally, we aim to identify the type of evidence and available data sources in those studies. Finally, we will determine the research gaps in the literature. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for this scoping review. The 'Population-Concept-Context' framework will be used to identify the eligibility criteria. A three-step search strategy will be conducted to find relevant studies in the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and EBSCOhost (SocIndex). Additionally, we will search on websites of international governmental institutions for further reports and articles. The finalisation of the search is planned for August 2023. The extracted data from the scoping review will be presented in a tabular form. A narrative summary of the selected studies will accompany the tabulated results and describe how they answer the research questions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We will exclusively use secondary data from available studies for our analysis. Therefore, this review does not require ethical approval. We aim to publish our findings at (inter-)national conferences and as an open-access, peer-reviewed journal article.

Indexed as

Academies and InstitutesPopulation HealthDatabases, FactualEligibility DeterminationEuropean UnionHumansScoping Reviews as TopicEPIDEMIOLOGYProtocols & guidelinesPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID37591651
PMCPMC10441078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.