ReviewCell systems2023
Simplifying complex antibody engineering using machine learning.
Review in Cell systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and Opportunities in Lentivirus Viral Vector Manufacturing for In Vivo Applications.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- AlphaBind, a domain-specific model to predict and optimize antibody-antigen binding affinity.mAbs · 2025Article
- Integrative and Emerging Models in Antibody Research: A Comprehensive Review.Antibody therapeutics · 2025Review
- Article
- Prediction of antibody-antigen interaction based on backbone aware with invariant point attention.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Biophysical cartography of the native and human-engineered antibody landscapes quantifies the plasticity of antibody developability.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Point-of-Care Biosensing: Challenges and Opportunities.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Prediction of polyspecificity from antibody sequence data by machine learning.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Machine learning is transforming antibody engineering by enabling the generation of drug-like monoclonal antibodies with unprecedented efficiency. Unsupervised algorithms trained on massive and diverse protein sequence datasets facilitate the prediction of panels of antibody variants with native-like intrinsic properties (e.g., high stability), greatly reducing the amount of subsequent experimentation needed to identify specific candidates that also possess desired extrinsic properties (e.g., high affinity). Additionally, supervised algorithms, which are trained on deep sequencing datasets obtained after enrichment of in vitro antibody libraries for one or more specific extrinsic properties, enable the prediction of antibody variants with desired combinations of extrinsic properties without the need for additional screening. Here we review recent advances using both machine learning approaches and how they are impacting the field of antibody engineering as well as key outstanding challenges and opportunities for these paradigm-changing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.