Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37590282›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Automatic detection and classification of lung cancer CT scans based on deep learning and ebola optimization search algorithm.

Tehnan I A Mohamed, Olaide N Oyelade, Absalom E Ezugwu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tehnan I A MohamedDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, University of Gezira, Wad Madani, Sudan.ORCID 0000-0002-7793-7999
Olaide N OyeladeDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Physical Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Absalom E EzugwuUnit for Data Science and Computing, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3721-3400

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, research has shown an increased spread of non-communicable diseases such as cancer. Lung cancer diagnosis and detection has become one of the biggest obstacles in recent years. Early lung cancer diagnosis and detection would reliably promote safety and the survival of many lives globally. The precise classification of lung cancer using medical images will help physicians select suitable therapy to reduce cancer mortality. Much work has been carried out in lung cancer detection using CNN. However, lung cancer prediction still becomes difficult due to the multifaceted designs in the CT scan. Moreover, CNN models have challenges that affect their performance, including choosing the optimal architecture, selecting suitable model parameters, and picking the best values for weights and biases. To address the problem of selecting optimal weight and bias combination required for classification of lung cancer in CT images, this study proposes a hybrid metaheuristic and CNN algorithm. We first designed a CNN architecture and then computed the solution vector of the model. The resulting solution vector was passed to the Ebola optimization search algorithm (EOSA) to select the best combination of weights and bias to train the CNN model to handle the classification problem. After thoroughly training the EOSA-CNN hybrid model, we obtained the optimal configuration, which yielded good performance. Experimentation with the publicly accessible Iraq-Oncology Teaching Hospital / National Center for Cancer Diseases (IQ-OTH/NCCD) lung cancer dataset showed that the EOSA metaheuristic algorithm yielded a classification accuracy of 0.9321. Similarly, the performance comparisons of EOSA-CNN with other methods, namely, GA-CNN, LCBO-CNN, MVO-CNN, SBO-CNN, WOA-CNN, and the classical CNN, were also computed and presented. The result showed that EOSA-CNN achieved a specificity of 0.7941, 0.97951, 0.9328, and sensitivity of 0.9038, 0.13333, and 0.9071 for normal, benign, and malignant cases, respectively. This confirms that the hybrid algorithm provides a good solution for the classification of lung cancer.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHemorrhagic Fever, EbolaLung NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHospitals, TeachingHumansTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID37590282
PMCPMC10434933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.