Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37590277›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Emotion regulation in children (ERiC): A protocol for a randomised clinical trial to evaluate the clinical and cost effectiveness of Mentalization Based Treatment (MBT) vs Treatment as Usual for school-age children with mixed emotional and behavioural difficulties.

Nick Midgley, Rose Mortimer, Mark Carter, Polly Casey, Lisa Coffman, Julian Edbrooke-Childs, Chloe Edridge, Peter Fonagy, Manuel Gomes, Anoushka Kapoor and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Nick MidgleyThe Anna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6263-5058
Rose MortimerThe Anna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Mark CarterBarnet, Enfield and Haringey NHS Trust, United Kingdom.
Polly CaseyThe Anna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1830-5043
Lisa CoffmanBarnet Parent/Carer Forum, United Kingdom.
Julian Edbrooke-ChildsThe Anna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Chloe EdridgeThe Anna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Peter FonagyThe Anna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Manuel GomesUniversity College London, United Kingdom.
Anoushka KapoorThe Anna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Susannah MarksOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
Peter MartinUniversity College London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4638-0638
Bettina MoltrechtThe Anna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Emma MorrisThe Anna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Nikola PokornaThe Anna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Tara McFarquharThe Anna Freud Centre, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8931-1061
Anna Freud Centre · GBUniversity College London · GBBarnet Enfield and Haringey Mental Health Trust · GBBarnet Hospital · GBOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of children referred to Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) in the UK will present with mixed emotional and behavioural difficulties, but most mental health treatments are developed for single disorders. There is a need for research on treatments that are helpful for these mixed difficulties, especially for school-age children. Emotion Regulation (ER) difficulties present across a wide range of mental health disorders and mentalizing may help with regulation. The ability to mentalize one's own experiences and those of others plays a key role in coping with stress, regulation of emotions, and the formation of stable relationships. Mentalization Based Therapy (MBT) is a well-evidenced therapy that aims to promote mentalization, which in turn increases ER capacities, leading to decreased emotional and behavioural difficulties. The aim of this study is to test the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of MBT compared to treatment as usual for school age children with emotional and behavioural difficulties. If effective, we hope this approach can become available to the growing number of children presenting to mental health services with a mix of emotional and behavioural difficulties. MATERIALS AND

methodsChildren referred to CAMHS aged 6-12 with mixed mental health problems (emotional and behavioural) as primary problem can take part with their parent/carers. Children will be randomly allocated to receive either MBT or treatment as usual (TAU) within the CAMHS clinic they have been referred to. MBT will be 6-8 sessions offered fortnightly and can flexibly include different family members. TAU is likely to include CBT, parenting groups, and/or children's social skills groups. Parent/carers and children will be asked to complete outcome assessments (questionnaires and tasks) online at the start of treatment, mid treatment (8 weeks), end of treatment (16 weeks) and at follow up (40 weeks).

trial registrationClinical trial registration: ISRCTN 11620914.

Indexed as

Emotional RegulationMentalizationAdolescentChildCost-Effectiveness AnalysisEmotionsHumansMentalization-Based TherapyParent-Child RelationsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID37590277
PMCPMC10434917
OpenAlexW4385932920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.