Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37590203›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Prospective randomised unblinded comparison of sputum viscosity for three methods of saline nebulisation in mechanically ventilated patients: A pilot study protocol.

Andrew Arnott, Robert Hart, Scott McQueen, Malcolm Watson, Malcolm Sim

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05635903 naunknown statusnot on this map

Can Continuous or Intermittent Normal Saline Nebulisation Via a Vibrating Mesh Nebuliser or Intermittent Normal Saline Via a Standard Jet Nebuliser Improve the Lung Physiology and Secretion Viscosity in Mechanically Ventilated Patients?

TypeinterventionalSponsorNHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeRan2019 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsRespiratory Failure, Critical IllnessArmsContinuous nebulisation 0.9% saline Aerogen Solo vibrating mesh Nebuliser, Intermittent nebulisation 0.9% saline Aerogen vibrating mesh Solo Nebuliser, Intermittent standard intermittent nebulisation of 0.9% saline Intersurgical Cirrus 2 self sealing Jet Nebuliser
NCT06834581 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Vibrating Mesh Nebulisation in Patients on Long-term Tracheostomy Ventilation: a Pilot Randomised Crossover Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustRan2025 to 2026Enrolled12ConditionsLong-term Tracheostomy Ventilated PatientsArmsVibrating mesh nebuliser, Jet nebuliser
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew ArnottCritical Care Department, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9694-2363
Robert HartCritical Care Department, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Scott McQueenCritical Care Department, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Malcolm WatsonCritical Care Department, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Malcolm SimCritical Care Department, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Queen Elizabeth University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHeat and moisture exchanger (HME) filters are commonly used as passive circuit humidifiers during mechanical ventilation, however, are only ~80% efficient. As a result, patients that undergo mechanical ventilation in critical care with HME filter circuits will be exposed to partial airway humidification. This is associated with detrimental effects including increased secretion load which has been shown to be an independent predictor of failed extubation. Nebulised normal saline is commonly utilised to supplement circuit humidification in ventilated patients with high secretion loads, although there are no randomised control trials evaluating its use. Novel vibrating mesh nebulisers generate a fine aerosol resulting in deeper lung penetration, potentially offering a more effective means of nebulisation in comparison to jet nebulisers. The primary aim of this study is to compare the viscosity of respiratory secretions after treatment with nebulised normal saline administered via vibrating mesh nebuliser or jet nebuliser. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This randomised controlled trial is enrolling 60 mechanically ventilated adult critical care patients breathing on HME filter circuits with high secretion loads. Recruited patients will be randomised to receive nebulised saline via 3 modalities: 1) Continuous vibrating mesh nebuliser; 2) Intermittent vibrating mesh nebuliser or 3) Intermittent jet nebuliser. Over the 72-hr study period, the patients' sputum viscosity (measured using a validated qualitative sputum assessment tool) and physiological parameters will be recorded by an unblinded assessor. A median reduction in secretion viscosity of ≥0.5 on the qualitative sputum assessment score will be deemed as a clinically significant improvement between treatment groups at analysis. DISCUSSION: At the conclusion of this trial, we will provisionally determine if nebulised normal saline administered via vibrating mesh nebulisation is superior to traditional jet nebulisation in terms of reduced respiratory secretion viscosity in intubated patients. Results from this pilot study will provide information to power a definitive clinical study.

trial registrationClinicalTrails.Gov Registry (NCT05635903).

Indexed as

Respiration, ArtificialSputumAdultHumansPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSaline SolutionViscositySaline Solution

Identifiers

PMID37590203
PMCPMC10434882
OpenAlexW4385945260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.