Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37590198›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Bacterial community structure of Anopheles hyrcanus group, Anopheles nivipes, Anopheles philippinensis, and Anopheles vagus from a malaria-endemic area in Thailand.

Patcharaporn Boonroumkaew, Rutchanee Rodpai, Atiporn Saeung, Kittipat Aupalee, Jassada Saingamsook, Petchaboon Poolphol, Lakkhana Sadaow, Oranuch Sanpool, Penchom Janwan, Tongjit Thanchomnang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Microbiota variation inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Patcharaporn BoonroumkaewDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Rutchanee RodpaiDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Atiporn SaeungCenter of Insect Vector Study, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Kittipat AupaleeCenter of Insect Vector Study, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-5716-4725
Jassada SaingamsookCenter of Insect Vector Study, Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Petchaboon PoolpholThe Office of Disease Prevention and Control Region 10th, Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand.
Lakkhana SadaowDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Oranuch SanpoolDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Penchom JanwanDepartment of Medical Technology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Thailand.
Tongjit ThanchomnangFaculty of Medicine, Mahasarakham University, Kham Riang, Maha Sarakham, Thailand.
Pewpan M IntapanDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Wanchai MaleewongDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6726-3759
Khon Kaen University · THChiang Mai University · THMahasarakham University · THWalailak University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial content of mosquitoes has given rise to the development of innovative tools that influence and seek to control malaria transmission. This study identified the bacterial microbiota in field-collected female adults of the Anopheles hyrcanus group and three Anopheles species, Anopheles nivipes, Anopheles philippinensis, and Anopheles vagus, from an endemic area in the southeastern part of Ubon Ratchathani Province, northeastern Thailand, near the Lao PDR-Cambodia-Thailand border. A total of 17 DNA libraries were generated from pooled female Anopheles abdomen samples (10 abdomens/ sample). The mosquito microbiota was characterized through the analysis of DNA sequences from the V3-V4 regions of the 16S rRNA gene, and data were analyzed in QIIME2. A total of 3,442 bacterial ASVs were obtained, revealing differences in the microbiota both within the same species/group and between different species/group. Statistical difference in alpha diversity was observed between An. hyrcanus group and An. vagus and between An. nivipes and An. vagus, and beta diversity analyses showed that the bacterial community of An. vagus was the most dissimilar from other species. The most abundant bacteria belonged to the Proteobacteria phylum (48%-75%) in which Pseudomonas, Serratia, and Pantoea were predominant genera among four Anopheles species/group. However, the most significantly abundant genus observed in each Anopheles species/group was as follows: Staphylococcus in the An. hyrcanus group, Pantoea in the An. nivipes, Rosenbergiella in An. philippinensis, and Pseudomonas in An. vagus. Particularly, Pseudomonas sp. was highly abundant in all Anopheles species except An. nivipes. The present study provides the first study on the microbiota of four potential malaria vectors as a starting step towards understanding the role of the microbiota on mosquito biology and ultimately the development of potential tools for malaria control.

Indexed as

AnophelesMalariaPantoeaAnimalsFemaleMosquito VectorsPseudomonasRNA, Ribosomal, 16SThailandRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID37590198
PMCPMC10434920
OpenAlexW4385937848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.