Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37590109›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2024

An Efficient Deep Neural Network to Classify Large 3D Images With Small Objects.

Jungkyu Park, Jakub Chledowski, Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Jan Witowski, Yanqi Xu, Linda Du, Sushma Gaddam, Eric Kim, Alana Lewin, Ujas Parikh and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jungkyu Park
Jakub Chledowski
Stanislaw Jastrzebski
Jan Witowski
Yanqi Xu
Linda Du
Sushma Gaddam
Eric Kim
Alana Lewin
Ujas Parikh
Anastasia Plaunova
Sardius Chen
Alexandra Millet
James Park
Kristine Pysarenko
Shalin Patel
Julia Goldberg
Melanie Wegener
Linda Moy
Laura Heacock
Beatriu Reig
Krzysztof J Geras
NYU Langone Health · USJagiellonian University · PLNew York University · US

Funding

TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Christopher M Collins · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
Reducing recall rates of screening mammography with deep convolutional neural networkR21CA225175 · NCI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MOY, LINDA · 2018 to 2019
$395k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA225175NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D imaging enables accurate diagnosis by providing spatial information about organ anatomy. However, using 3D images to train AI models is computationally challenging because they consist of 10x or 100x more pixels than their 2D counterparts. To be trained with high-resolution 3D images, convolutional neural networks resort to downsampling them or projecting them to 2D. We propose an effective alternative, a neural network that enables efficient classification of full-resolution 3D medical images. Compared to off-the-shelf convolutional neural networks, our network, 3D Globally-Aware Multiple Instance Classifier (3D-GMIC), uses 77.98%-90.05% less GPU memory and 91.23%-96.02% less computation. While it is trained only with image-level labels, without segmentation labels, it explains its predictions by providing pixel-level saliency maps. On a dataset collected at NYU Langone Health, including 85,526 patients with full-field 2D mammography (FFDM), synthetic 2D mammography, and 3D mammography, 3D-GMIC achieves an AUC of 0.831 (95% CI: 0.769-0.887) in classifying breasts with malignant findings using 3D mammography. This is comparable to the performance of GMIC on FFDM (0.816, 95% CI: 0.737-0.878) and synthetic 2D (0.826, 95% CI: 0.754-0.884), which demonstrates that 3D-GMIC successfully classified large 3D images despite focusing computation on a smaller percentage of its input compared to GMIC. Therefore, 3D-GMIC identifies and utilizes extremely small regions of interest from 3D images consisting of hundreds of millions of pixels, dramatically reducing associated computational challenges. 3D-GMIC generalizes well to BCS-DBT, an external dataset from Duke University Hospital, achieving an AUC of 0.848 (95% CI: 0.798-0.896).

Indexed as

BreastImaging, Three-DimensionalHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMammographyNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID37590109
PMCPMC11449265
OpenAlexW4385945267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.