Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37590037›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2023

Patient Use, Experience, and Satisfaction With Telehealth in an Australian Population (Reimagining Health Care): Web-Based Survey Study.

Elizabeth Thomas, Crystal Man Ying Lee, Richard Norman, Leanne Wells, Tim Shaw, Julia Nesbitt, Isobel Frean, Luke Baxby, Sabine Bennett, Suzanne Robinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth Thomas *School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2054-872X
Crystal Man Ying Lee *School of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6613-5491
Richard NormanSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3112-3893
Leanne WellsConsumers Health Forum of Australia, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-4223-115X
Tim ShawCharles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0783-1918
Julia NesbittConsumers Health Forum of Australia, Canberra, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-3701-6300
Isobel FreanDigital Health Cooperative Research Centre, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7783-6928
Luke BaxbyDeloitte, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0009-0007-0286-8021
Sabine BennettDeloitte, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3918-3572
Suzanne RobinsonSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5703-6475
Curtin University · AUDeakin University · AUDigital Health Cooperative Research CentreThe University of Sydney · AUThe University of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic triggered a rapid scale-up of telehealth services in Australia as a means to provide continued care through periods of physical restrictions. The factors that influence engagement in telehealth remain unclear.

objectiveThe purpose of this study is to understand the experience of Australian people who engaged in a telehealth consultation during the pandemic period (2020-2021) and the demographic factors that influence engagement.

methodsA web-based survey was distributed to Australians aged over 18 years that included 4 questions on frequency and type of clinical consultation, including with a general practitioner (GP), specialist, allied health, or nurse; 1 question on the experience of telehealth; and 2 questions on the quality of and satisfaction with telehealth. Statistical analysis included proportion of responses (of positive responses where a Likert scale was used) and regression analyses to determine the effect of demographic variables.

resultsOf the 1820 participants who completed the survey, 88.3% (1607/1820) had engaged in a health care consultation of some type in the previous 12 months, and 69.3% (1114/1607) of those had used telehealth. The most common type of consultation was with a GP (959/1114, 86.1%). Older people were more likely to have had a health care consultation but less likely to have had a telehealth consultation. There was no difference in use of telehealth between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan regions; however, people with a bachelor's degree or above were more likely to have used telehealth and to report a positive experience. A total of 87% (977/1114) of participants agreed or strongly agreed that they had received the information they required from their consultation, 71% (797/1114) agreed or strongly agreed that the outcome of their consultation was the same as it would have been face-to-face, 84% (931/1114) agreed or strongly agreed that the doctor or health care provider made them feel comfortable, 83% (924/1114) agreed or strongly agreed that the doctor or health care provider was equally as knowledgeable as providers they have seen in person; 57% (629/1114) of respondents reported that they would not have been able to access their health consultation if it were not for telehealth; 69% (765/1114) of respondents reported that they were satisfied with their telehealth consultation, and 60% (671/1114) reported that they would choose to continue to use telehealth in the future.

conclusionsThere was a relatively high level of engagement with telehealth over the 12 months leading up to the study period, and the majority of participants reported a positive experience and satisfaction with their telehealth consultation. While there was no indication that remoteness influenced telehealth usage, there remains work to be done to improve access to older people and those with less than a bachelor's degree.

Indexed as

COVID-19General PractitionersTelemedicineAdultAgedAustraliaHumansInternetMiddle AgedPandemicsPatient SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionAustraliaconsumer experiencedemographic influencehealth care surveyparticipant recruitmentpopulation surveytelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID37590037
PMCPMC10472164
OpenAlexW4367336425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.