ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2023
T2-FLAIR mismatch sign correlates with
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Expanded T2-FLAIR Mismatch Phenotype in IDH-Mutant Astrocytomas.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Editorial for "An Expanded T2-FLAIR Mismatch Phenotype in IDH-Mutant Astrocytomas".Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Impact of [Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe T2-FLAIR mismatch sign is recognized as an imaging finding highly suggestive of IDH-mutant astrocytomas. This study was designed to determine whether the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign correlates with uptake of
methodsWe included 78 histopathologically verified lower-grade gliomas (grade 2: 31 cases, grade 3: 47 cases) in this study. 78 patients underwent
resultsThe 78 lower-grade gliomas were assigned to one of three molecular groups: Group A (IDH-mutant and 1p/19q non-codeleted, n = 22), Group O (IDH-mutant and 1p/19q codeleted, n = 20), and Group W (IDH wildtype, n = 36). T2-FLAIR mismatch was found in 16 cases (20.5%) that were comprised of 8 (36.4%), 0 (0%), 8 (22.2%) cases in the molecular group A, O and W, respectively. The median T/N ratio of MET-PET in tumors with T2-FLAIR mismatch was 1.50, which was significantly lower than that of tumors without T2-FLAIR mismatch (1.83, p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). In the Groups A and W (excluding Group O), the median T/N ratio on MET-PET in groups A and W (but not group O) with T2-FLAIR mismatch was 1.50, which was significantly lower than that of tumors without T2-FLAIR mismatch (1.81, p = 0.002, Mann-Whitney U test).
conclusionThe T2-FLAIR mismatch sign correlated with lower
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.