Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37589901›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2024

Performance of [

Qiuya Yang, Delong Huang, Junhao Wu, Haoshu Zhong, YuanHang Han, Haodong Jiang, Yue Chen, Gong Chen, Xiang Zhan, Ping Zhou

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Clinical Evaluation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. cGMP-compliant high-yield automated production of [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor (FAPI)-Based Theranostics.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  15. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy betweenJournal of thoracic disease · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparison ofFrontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Qiuya YangSouthwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Delong HuangSouthwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Junhao WuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & PET Center, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Haoshu ZhongDepartment of Hematology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
YuanHang HanSouthwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Haodong JiangSouthwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Yue ChenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China.
Gong ChenChengdu Sport University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiang ZhanDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No.25, Taiping St, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China.
Ping ZhouDepartment of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No.25, Taiping St, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China. zhouping11@swmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0643-8527
Southwest Medical University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNChengdu Sport University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

Luzhou Municipal People's Government-Southwest Medical University Science and Technology Strategic Cooperation Fund No. 2020LZXNYDJ12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis article aims to compare the diagnostic performance of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose ([

methodsA systematic search was conducted on the Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed/MEDLINE databases from inception until November 1, 2022. Included studies assessed the use of FAPI PET/CT and [

resultsThe sensitivity of FAPI PET/CT in detecting primary lung cancer lesions was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.88-1.00), while the sensitivity of [

conclusionIn the diagnosis of metastatic lung cancer lesions, FAPI PET/CT demonstrated a higher sensitivity compared to [ CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: FAPI may be an alternative to [ KEY POINTS: • This article is to compare the performance of [

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Lung NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsHumansLymphatic MetastasisSensitivity and SpecificityFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsFAPI PETLung cancerMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID37589901
OpenAlexW4385897406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.