Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37589831›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2023

Understanding the Clinical Implications of Individual Patient Characteristics and Treatment Choice on the Risk of Exacerbation in Asthma Patients with Moderate-Severe Symptoms.

Dave Singh, Sean Oosterholt, Ian Pavord, Gabriel Garcia, Abhijith Pg, Oscar Della Pasqua

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Multifaceted mechanistic exploration ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Dave SinghUniversity of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundations Trust, Manchester, UK.
Sean OosterholtClinical Pharmacology Modelling and Simulation, GSK, GSK House, 980 Great West Rd, London, TW8 9GS, UK.
Ian PavordNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Gabriel GarciaRespiratory Medicine Service, Rossi Hospital, La Plata, Argentina.
Abhijith PgGSK, Global Classic and Established Medicines, Singapore, Singapore.
Oscar Della PasquaClinical Pharmacology Modelling and Simulation, GSK, GSK House, 980 Great West Rd, London, TW8 9GS, UK. odp72514@gsk.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6211-1430
Age UK · GBHospital Italiano La Plata · ARManchester University NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe assessment of future risk has become an important feature in the management of patients with asthma. However, the contribution of patient-specific characteristics and treatment choices to the risk of exacerbation is poorly understood. Here we evaluated the effect of interindividual baseline differences on the risk of exacerbation and treatment performance in patients receiving regular maintenance doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or ICS/long-acting beta-agonists (LABA) combination therapy.

methodsExacerbations and changes to asthma symptoms 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) were simulated over a 12-month period using a time-to-event and a longitudinal model developed from phase III/IV studies in patients with moderate-severe asthma (N = 16,282). Simulations were implemented to explore treatment performance across different scenarios, including randomised designs and real-world settings. Treatment options included regular dosing with ICS monotherapy [fluticasone propionate (FP)] and combination therapy [fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL) or budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR)]. Exacerbation rate was analysed using the log-rank test. The cumulative incidence of events was summarised stratified by treatment.

resultsBeing a woman, smoker, having higher baseline ACQ-5 and body mass index (BMI) and lower forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV

conclusionsIndividual baseline characteristics and treatment choices affect future risk. Achieving comparable levels of symptom control whilst on treatment does not imply comparable risk reduction, as shown by the lower exacerbation rates in FP/SAL vs. BUD/FOR-treated patients. These factors should be considered as a basis for personalised clinical management of patients with moderate-severe asthma.

Indexed as

AsthmaBody Mass IndexBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug CombinationCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFluticasoneFluticasone-Salmeterol Drug CombinationHumansMaleBudesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug CombinationFluticasoneFluticasone-Salmeterol Drug CombinationACQ-5Asthma exacerbationClinical trial simulationsFluticasone propionateFuture riskICS/LABA combination therapySalmeterolSymptom controlTreatable traits

Identifiers

PMID37589831
PMCPMC10499702
OpenAlexW4385898315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.