Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37589766›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

MRI-based torsion measurement of the lower limb is a reliable and valid alternative for CT measurement: a prospective study.

Leonard Grünwald, Tina Histing, Fabian Springer, Gabriel Keller

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06420180 (The Effect of Lower Limb Rotation on Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Management in Patients With Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06420180 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Lower Limb Rotation on Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Management in Patients With Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

TypeobservationalSponsorAl-Azhar UniversityRan2024 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsFemoro Acetabular ImpingementArmship arthroscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leonard GrünwaldDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. leonard@familie-gruenwald.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3516-8906
Tina HistingDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Fabian SpringerDepartment of Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstrasse 95, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Gabriel KellerDepartment of Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Schnarrenbergstrasse 95, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to compare MRI-based torsion measurements of the lower limb to a well-established CT-based assessment in a prospective inter- and intraindividual approach.

methodsA total of 26 patients (age 28.8 years ± 11.0) were enrolled beginning in January 2021 until August 2022. Inclusion criteria were the clinical indication for torsion measurement of the lower limb. CT and MRI imaging were performed with a standard operating procedure, to ensure that all patients were examined in a standardized position. The examinations were planned on a coronal scout view based on prominent anatomical landmarks. Femoral and tibial torsion were measured individually. Torsion measurements were analysed twice: immediately after examination and after 3 weeks. Subsequently, intra-rater and parallel test reliability was calculated accordingly.

resultsHigh significant results for CT and MRI measurements for both tibia (MRI: r = 0.961; p ≤ 0.001; CT: r = 0.963; p ≤ 0.001) and femur (MRI: r = 0.980; p ≤ 0.001; CT: r = 0.979; p ≤ 0.001) were obtained by calculated intra-rater reliability, showing that measurements were highly consistent for MRI and CT, respectively. Parallel test reliability for time point 1 as well as time point 2 was also highly significant and ranged from r = 0.947 to r = 0.972 (all with p ≤ 0.001, respectively) for both tibia and femur, showing a high concordance between the two measurements.

conclusionMeasurement of tibial as well as femoral torsion was comparable for CT and MRI measurement. Therefore, this study supports MRI measurement as an equivalent alternative for CT measurement concerning torsional malalignment to reduce exposure to radiation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Indexed as

FemurTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultHumansLower ExtremityMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsTibiaTorsion AbnormalityCTFemurMRIRadiation exposureReliabilityTibiaTorsional malalignmentValidityWaidelich

Identifiers

PMID37589766
PMCPMC10598136
OpenAlexW4385898017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.