Observational studyHerz2024
Heart rate variability as a predictor of successful catheter-guided pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation.
Observational study in Herz, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Photoplethysmography-Based Machine Learning Approaches for Atrial Fibrillation Burden: Algorithm Development and Validation.JMIR cardio · 2025Article
- Effects of low-dose metoprolol succinate sustained-release tablets on patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Vagal AF induction test (VAFIT): a new endpoint for optimizing atrial fibrillation ablation through cardioneuroablation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis retrospective observational study investigated the relationship between heart rate variability (HRV) and atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) by cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation (RF).
methodsWe enrolled 497 patients who underwent PVI using first-generation cryoballoon (CB1), second-generation cryoballoon (CB2), or RF. We analyzed HRV as a surrogate for modulation of the intrinsic autonomic nervous system using 24‑h Holter recordings 1 or 2 days after the procedure and compared the recurrence and non-recurrence group with regard to ablation methods. Furthermore, we calculated recurrence-free survival (RFS) below/over HRV cut-off values for the whole study population and separately for each ablation method.
resultsAll except one of the five time-based HRV parameters analyzed were significantly lower in the non-recurrence group than in the recurrence group after CB2. Only a trend toward lower HRV for the non-recurrence group was found after RF and no remarkable differences were detected after CB1. The HRV parameters below their calculated cut-off were associated with a significantly higher RFS rate 2 years after CB2. This also applied to root mean sum of squared distance (rMSSD) and the percentage of adjacent NN interval differences greater than 50 ms (pNN50) after RF. No differences were found regarding CB1. Concerning rMSSD, the sensitivity, specificity, and difference in RFS increased when using cut-offs that were calculated including only CB2 patients. Multivariate cox regression analysis showed that low rMSSD values could independently predict AF recurrence after adjusting for covariates (hazard ratio: 0.50; p < 0.001).
conclusionLow values of rMSSD early after a PVI could independently predict AF recurrence, especially after CB2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.