Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37589589›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

Adjusting for gene-specific covariates to improve RNA-seq analysis.

Hyeongseon Jeon, Kyu-Sang Lim, Yet Nguyen, Dan Nettleton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hyeongseon JeonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3539-4332
Kyu-Sang LimDepartment of Animal Resources Science, Kongju National University, Yesan-gun, Chungnam 32439, Republic of Korea.
Yet NguyenDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA 23529, United States.
Dan NettletonDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, Unites States.ORCID 0000-0002-6045-1036

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryThis article suggests a novel positive false discovery rate (pFDR) controlling method for testing gene-specific hypotheses using a gene-specific covariate variable, such as gene length. We suppose the null probability depends on the covariate variable. In this context, we propose a rejection rule that accounts for heterogeneity among tests by using two distinct types of null probabilities. We establish a pFDR estimator for a given rejection rule by following Storey's q-value framework. A condition on a type 1 error posterior probability is provided that equivalently characterizes our rejection rule. We also present a suitable procedure for selecting a tuning parameter through cross-validation that maximizes the expected number of hypotheses declared significant. A simulation study demonstrates that our method is comparable to or better than existing methods across realistic scenarios. In data analysis, we find support for our method's premise that the null probability varies with a gene-specific covariate variable. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code repository is publicly available at https://github.com/hsjeon1217/conditional_method.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisResearch DesignComputer SimulationProbabilityRNA-Seq

Identifiers

PMID37589589
PMCPMC10460482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.