Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37589501›Full record

ArticleOccupational medicine (Oxford, England)2023

Comparing shift work tolerance across occupations, work arrangements, and gender.

I Saksvik-Lehouillier, T A Sørengaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational medicine (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

I Saksvik-LehouillierDepartment of Psychology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1953-7364
T A SørengaardBI Norwegian Business School, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

NTNU
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are individual differences in shift work tolerance; however, we lack knowledge about how this is experienced across different occupations, sex and shift types.

aimsThe aim was to describe and investigate shift work tolerance, and individual differences in shift work tolerance, in two occupations, between men and women and between day/evening workers and rotating shift workers.

methodsCross-sectional questionnaire study. The sample was comprised of 315 retail workers and 410 police employees.

resultsShift work tolerance was higher among police employees compared to retail workers, among men compared to women, and among day workers compared to evening/rotating shift workers. The difference was larger between occupations than between sex and shift type. Evening workers had more symptoms of shift work intolerance than rotating shift workers. Neuroticism and autonomy were related to all symptoms of shift work tolerance among retail workers, but not police employees.

conclusionsIt is important to consider the type of occupation and the work context when tailoring work arrangements to the individual.

Indexed as

OccupationsShift Work ScheduleWork Schedule ToleranceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPoliceSex FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37589501
PMCPMC10588777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.