Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37589481›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

Volunteering on Heritage at Risk sites and wellbeing: A qualitative interview study.

Julie Pattinson, Despina Laparidou, Joseph Akanuwe, Anna Scott, Claudia Sima, Carenza Lewis, Niro Siriwardena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Volunteering on Heritage at Risk sites and wellbeing: A qualitative interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julie PattinsonCommunity and Health Research Unit (CaHRU), School of Health and Social Care, College of Social Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9824-3400
Despina LaparidouCommunity and Health Research Unit (CaHRU), School of Health and Social Care, College of Social Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5427-7422
Joseph AkanuwePrimary Care and Public Health Research, Community and Health Research Unit (CaHRU), School of Health and Social Care, College of Social Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4322-6742
Anna ScottUniversity of Lincoln College of Arts and Programme Manager Centre for Culture and Creativity, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Claudia SimaDepartment of Marketing Languages and Tourism, Lincoln International Business School, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.
Carenza LewisUniversity of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7705-1197
Niro SiriwardenaDirector of the University of Lincoln Community and Health Research Unit (CaHRU), School of Health and Social Care, College of Social Science, Lincoln, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2484-8201

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe explored experiences of volunteering in Heritage at Risk (HAR) projects, intended to mitigate the deterioration to historic assets, and the relationship with wellbeing. We aimed to understand the value of HAR to volunteers' wellbeing and relationships between HAR programme characteristics such as location, asset type and type of activity.

methodsWe used a qualitative design with semi-structured interviews of a purposive sample of volunteers recruited via Historic England (HE), employing Systematic Grounded Theory involving open, axial and selective coding.

findingsWe interviewed 35 volunteers (18 male and 17 female) participating in 10 HAR projects. We identified six themes from the data analysis. (1) Purpose-was associated with volunteering motivations; there were some barriers to volunteering and many types of facilitators, including accessibility to local heritage sites. (2) Being-volunteers showed an appreciation and attachment to their place of residence. (3) Capacity-to learn heritage-specific skills and diversify experiences in learning new skills (life, technical and personal). (4) Sharing-community engagement, connectedness, and inclusivity captured diversity and inclusion within volunteers across age, ethnicity, ability, and gender. (5) Self-nurture-HAR volunteering created physical, psychological, and social benefits with limited risks and adverse outcomes. (6) Self-actualisation-described volunteers reflecting on their experiences.

conclusionHAR volunteering was associated with positive physical, social and psychological wellbeing outcomes. The study provides an evidence base for specific wellbeing benefits of volunteering at Heritage at Risk sites, although we could not conclude that HAR project activity was the cause of increased wellbeing. PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Staff from HE were involved in designing the project brief. In selecting the HAR project sites, we took advice and recommendations from HE staff across all their six regional offices.

Indexed as

MotivationVolunteersEnglandFemaleHumansLearningMaleQualitative Researchheritagemotivationsphysicalpsychologicalriskvolunteeringwellbeing

Identifiers

PMID37589481
PMCPMC10632620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.