Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37589406›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental toxicology and chemistry2023

Meta-Analysis Comparing Nominal and Measured Concentrations of Perfluorooctanoic Acid and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate in Aquatic Toxicity Studies Across Various Experimental Conditions.

Amanda L Jarvis, James R Justice, Brian Schnitker, Kathryn Gallagher

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental toxicology and chemistry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda L JarvisOffice of Water, Office of Science and Technology, Health and Ecological Criteria Division, Ecological Risk Assessment Branch, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
James R JusticeOffice of Water, Office of Science and Technology, Health and Ecological Criteria Division, Ecological Risk Assessment Branch, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Brian SchnitkerOffice of Water, Office of Science and Technology, Health and Ecological Criteria Division, Ecological Risk Assessment Branch, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Kathryn GallagherOffice of Water, Office of Science and Technology, Health and Ecological Criteria Division, Ecological Risk Assessment Branch, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Office of Science · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) are among the most frequently detected chemicals among the per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in aquatic environments. Because of their high detection frequency, persistence, and potential toxicity, interest in both PFOA and PFOS has increased in recent years. However, a substantial number of PFOA and PFOS toxicity tests only report nominal, or unmeasured, treatment concentrations, which may complicate the determination of protective values. In addition, previous literature has indicated that differences between nominal and measured concentrations of both PFOA and PFOS could be linked to experimental conditions (e.g., feeding regimes for test organisms, test vessel material [glass or plastic], use of solvent, and the presence of substrate). Therefore, this critical review examined whether nominal and measured concentrations were in close agreement with each other among the current PFOA and PFOS aquatic toxicity literature and if experimental conditions were associated with any observed differences. Nominal and measured concentrations in the current PFOA and PFOS aquatic toxicity literature generally displayed a high degree of linear correlation and relatively low median percent differences. Correlations between measured and nominal concentrations were >0.98 for PFOA and >0.95 for PFOS in freshwater tests across experimental conditions. For saltwater tests, correlations of >0.84 were observed for PFOA and PFOS (separate and combined) across experimental conditions. While measured PFOA and PFOS toxicity tests are generally preferred, the present meta-analysis demonstrated that experimental conditions had little influence on observed discrepancies between nominal and measured concentrations, with the exception of PFOS saltwater tests and PFOA and PFOS freshwater studies that contained substrate. Unmeasured tests with these conditions should be considered carefully based on project needs, with the caveat that the data sets for these two experimental conditions were limited. Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:2289-2301. Published 2023. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Indexed as

Alkanesulfonic AcidsFluorocarbonsCaprylatesAlkanesulfonic AcidsCaprylatesFluorocarbonsperfluorooctaneperfluorooctane sulfonic acidperfluorooctanoic acidPer- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)PFAS ecotoxicity testing

Identifiers

PMID37589406
PMCPMC11375628
OpenAlexW4385897831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.