Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37589189›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Definitive aetiology of unexplained syncope after cardiovascular autonomic tests in a tertiary syncope unit.

Parisa Torabi, Viktor Hamrefors, Richard Sutton, Michele Brignole, Artur Fedorowski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Now is the time to take syncope seriously.The British journal of cardiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Syncope: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment 2024.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Clinical characteristics of psychogenic pseudosyncope in a population-based cohort.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Syncope and All-Cause Mortality in Heart Failure: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2025
    Article
  9. Aetiology and haemodynamic patterns of orthostatic hypotension in a tertiary syncope unit.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Carotid sinus massage in clinical practice.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Carotid sinus massage in clinical practice: the Six-Step-Method.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Procedural and Intermediate-term Results of the Electroanatomical-guided Cardioneuroablation for the Treatment of Supra-Hisian Second- or Advanced-degree Atrioventricular Block: the PIRECNA multicentre registry.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. A cross-sectional nationwide survey of guideline based syncope units in the Netherlands: the SU-19 score-a novel validation for best practices.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Parisa TorabiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4324-5844
Viktor HamreforsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8475-0866
Richard SuttonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5710-1094
Michele BrignoleIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Faint and Fall Research Centre, Ospedale San Luca, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1845-5607
Artur FedorowskiDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5352-6327
Lund University · SEIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

Crafoord FoundationRegion SkåneSwedish Heart Lung Foundation 20160519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsSyncope is a common condition with many possible causes, ranging from benign to life-threatening aetiologies. Establishing a diagnosis can be difficult, and specialized syncope units, using cardiovascular autonomic tests (CATs), including a head-up tilt test, can increase the diagnostic yield. However, up to one-fifth of examined patients have inconclusive CAT results. The aim of the present study was to investigate the predictive value of history, and clinical findings for unexplained syncope after CAT and characterize the group with negative results. METHODS AND

resultsConsecutive syncope patients [n = 2663, 61% women, median age 52 (32-69) years] were evaluated and CAT explained aetiology of syncope in 79% of cases, whereas 21% remained unexplained. Predictors of negative CAT were older age at first syncope (+8% higher odds per 10-year increment, P = 0.042), higher supine heart rate (HR; +12% per 10 b.p.m.; P = 0.003), absence of prodromes (+48%; P < 0.001), hypertension (+45%; P = 0.003), diabetes (+82%; P < 0.001), heart failure (+98%; P = 0.014), and coronary artery disease (+51%; P = 0.027). Compared with vasovagal syncope, patients with negative CAT were older, reported more often the absence of prodromes, and had a higher burden of cardiovascular comorbidities.

conclusionA cardiovascular autonomic test established the cause of syncope in 79% of patients evaluated in a syncope unit. Syncope without prodromes and cardiovascular comorbidities were significant predictors of failure to reveal an aetiology from assessment by CAT. These are known risk factors for cardiac syncope and patients with inconclusive CAT warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseHeart FailureSyncope, VasovagalCausalityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSyncopeCardiovascular autonomic testsHead-up tilt testSyncopeUnexplained syncope

Identifiers

PMID37589189
PMCPMC10505743
OpenAlexW4385898004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.