Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37589146›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Novel or established cryoballoon ablation system for pulmonary vein isolation: the prospective ICE-AGE-1 study.

Christian-Hendrik Heeger, Sorin Stefan Popescu, Tim Inderhees, Noemi Nussbickel, Charlotte Eitel, Bettina Kirstein, Huong-Lan Phan, Sascha Hatahet, Behnam Subin, Anna Traub and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Venous vascular closure system vs. figure-of-eight suture following atrial fibrillation ablation: the STYLE-AF Study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Trial
  5. Predictors of arrhythmia recurrence after cryoballoon ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a comparative analysis from the CONTRAST-CRYO trial.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Comparative analysis of newest-generation variable-diameter cryoballoon with pulsed-field ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: the CRYO-PULSE Study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Anaesthesia for Pulsed Field Ablation Procedures.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Contemporary Trends in Pulsed Field Ablation for Cardiac Arrhythmias.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Review
  15. In vivo safety and pulmonary vein isolation performance of a new cryoballoon for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Current Balloon Devices for Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Christian-Hendrik HeegerUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9014-8097
Sorin Stefan PopescuUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5469-8833
Tim InderheesUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-7046-9101
Noemi NussbickelUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Charlotte EitelUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8733-6791
Bettina KirsteinUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6881-871X
Huong-Lan PhanUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6867-914X
Sascha HatahetUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Behnam SubinUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4997-9841
Anna TraubUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Niels GroßeUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0009-0008-2060-721X
Karl-Heinz KuckUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2649-3870
Julia VoglerUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8386-9750
Roland R TilzUniversity Heart Center Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0122-7130

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCatheter ablation with a cryoballoon (CB) provides effective and durable pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) associated with encouraging clinical outcome data. The novel POLARx CB incorporates unique features, which may translate into improved safety, efficacy, and outcomes. The ICE-AGE-1 study aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and 1-year clinical follow-up of the POLARx CB in comparison to the Arctic Front Advance Pro CB (AF-CB4). METHODS AND

resultsA total of 103 consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent POLARx-based PVI (POLARx group) were prospectively enrolled and were compared to 102 consecutive patients previously treated with the AF-CB4 (AF-CB4 group). The mean age was 68.7 ± 10.2 (POLARx) and 65.7 ± 12 (AF-CB4, P = 0.0551) years. A total of 412 (POLARx) and 404 (AF-CB4) PVs were identified. All PVs, except for one PV in the POLARx group, were successfully isolated. A significant difference regarding the mean minimal CB temperature reached using the POLARx CB (-56.1 ± 8.3°C) and AF-CB4 (-46.9 ± 10.1°C) was observed (P < 0.0001). Real-time PVI was visualized in 71% of PVs in the POLARx group and 46% of them in the AF-CB4 group (P < 0.001). The mean procedure time was comparable: 54.5 ± 17.1 min for POLARx and 59.4 ± 18.6 min for AF-CB4 (P = 0.0509). No differences were observed in terms of periprocedural complications. There were comparable rates in freedom of AF or atrial tachycardia recurrence after 12 months, beyond a 90-day long blanking period: 78.9% in the POLARx group vs. 77.2% in the AF-CB4 group (P = 0.804).

conclusionThe novel POLARx CB showed similar safety, efficacy, and 1-year recurrence-free survival rates compared to the AF-CB4. A higher rate of real-time electrical PV recordings and significantly lower balloon temperatures were observed using the POLARx as compared to AF-CB4.

Indexed as

Catheter AblationPulmonary VeinsAgedHumansInfantMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTemperatureAcute efficacyAtrial fibrillationCryoballoonFollow-upPulmonary vein isolation

Identifiers

PMID37589146
PMCPMC10468200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.