ArticleMaedica2023
A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Assessment of the Relationship between Incisal and Condylar Guidance.
Article in Maedica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mandibular Kinematics on an Orthodontic Population Assessed with an Optical Jaw Tracking System: A Comparative Study.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Accuracy analysis of all-ceramic crowns with different materials in CAD/CAM digital replication mode.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- The correlation analysis between incisal guidance angle and occlusal plane angles and temporomandibular joint morphology.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Modifications of the articular eminence inclination in association with the loss of occlusal support in the molar area. A cone-beam computed tomography study.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The success of complex prosthodontic treatment is believed to be conditioned by condylar path replication in the articulator, as there is a continuing debate in the scientific community regarding the anatomical relationship between joint and dental morphology. The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential correlation between incisal and condylar guidance. The study population consisted of 20-30-year-old full dentate individuals with Angle class 1 occlusion, whose cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were analyzed by two investigators. The anterior slope of the right and left glenoid fossa angle and the palatal slope of all maxillary frontal teeth were measured by software tools at three defined landmarks, and the mean values were calculated. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 19.0), and the Pearson r coefficient test was used to assess correlations. The results reveal a highly statistically significant correlation between median condylar slopes and between median incisal slopes of the anterior teeth, on the left and right side, in the three standard areas (p<0.01). However, no significant correlation was found between the condylar slopes and the incisal slopes of the anterior teeth (p>0.01) in class 1 Angle subjects. In conclusion, this study did not provide evidence to support the existence of a significant correlation between incisal and condylar guidance in the population under investigation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.